Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23938284›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2013

Wnt signalling in osteoporosis: mechanisms and novel therapeutic approaches.

Ernesto Canalis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 310 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antiosteoporotic activity of nodakenetin, a coumarin compound fromJournal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ernesto CanalisDepartment of Research, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Centre, 114 Woodland Street, Hartford, CT 06105-1299, USA. ecanalis@stfranciscare.org.
Hartford Financial Services (United States)

Funding

Mechanisms of Notch Action in BoneR01DK045227 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CANALIS, ERNESTO · 1991 to 2018
$4.7M
Growth Factors; Effect on Aspects of Bone FormationR01AR021707 · NIAMS · ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER · PI CANALIS, ERNESTO · 1986 to 2012
$2.5M
Role of Notch Signaling in OsteocytesR01AR063049 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CANALIS, ERNESTO · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
GROWTH FACTORS EFFECT ON ASPECTS OF BONE FORMATIONR37AR021707 · NIAMS · ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER · PI CANALIS, ERNESTO · 1992 to 2001
$624k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR021707NIAMS NIH HHS AR063049NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063049NIDDK NIH HHS DK045227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by bone loss, which results in architectural deterioration of the skeleton, compromised bone strength and an increased risk of fragility fractures. Most current therapies for osteoporosis stabilize the skeleton by inhibiting bone resorption (antiresorptive agents), but the development of anabolic therapies that can increase bone formation and bone mass is of great interest. Wnt signalling induces differentiation of bone-forming cells (osteoblasts) and suppresses the development of bone-resorbing cells (osteoclasts). The Wnt pathway is controlled by antagonists that interact either directly with Wnt proteins or with Wnt co-receptors. The importance of Wnt signalling in bone formation is indicated by skeletal disorders such as sclerosteosis and van Buchem syndrome, which are caused by mutations in the gene encoding the Wnt antagonist sclerostin (SOST). Experiments in mice have shown that downregulation or neutralization of Wnt antagonists enhances bone formation. Phase II clinical trials show that 1-year treatment with antisclerostin antibodies increases bone formation, decreases bone resorption and leads to a substantial increase in BMD. Consequently, Wnt signalling can be targeted by the neutralization of its extracellular antagonists to obtain a skeletal anabolic response.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Density Conservation AgentsHumansOsteoblastsOsteoporosisWnt ProteinsWnt Signaling PathwayBone Density Conservation AgentsWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23938284
OpenAlexW2045936444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.