Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23938117›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2013

Evaluation of emergency department performance - a systematic review on recommended performance and quality-in-care measures.

Christian Michel Sørup, Peter Jacobsen, Jakob Lundager Forberg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Use Of Fundus Photography In The Emergency Room-A Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Reduced left-without-being-seen rates and impact on disparities after guest services ambassadors implementation.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Extending emergency care beyond discharge: Piloting a virtual after care clinic.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2024
    Article
  15. When Patients Go to "Dr. Google" Before They Go to the Emergency Department.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Observational
  16. Review
  17. Development of an emergency department end of life care audit tool: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023
    Article
  18. [Indicators to measure the performance of emergency trauma care].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian Michel SørupDTU Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet, building 424, 2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. cmiso@dtu.dk
Peter Jacobsen
Jakob Lundager Forberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of emergency department (ED) performance remains a difficult task due to the lack of consensus on performance measures that reflects high quality, efficiency, and sustainability.

aimTo describe, map, and critically evaluate which performance measures that the published literature regard as being most relevant in assessing overall ED performance.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review of review articles reporting accentuated ED performance measures was conducted in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Study eligibility criteria includes: 1) the main purpose was to discuss, analyse, or promote performance measures best reflecting ED performance, 2) the article was a review article, and 3) the article reported macro-level performance measures, thus reflecting an overall departmental performance level.

resultsA number of articles addresses this study's objective (n = 14 of 46 unique hits). Time intervals and patient-related measures were dominant in the identified performance measures in review articles from US, UK, Sweden and Canada. Length of stay (LOS), time between patient arrival to initial clinical assessment, and time between patient arrivals to admission were highlighted by the majority of articles. Concurrently, "patients left without being seen" (LWBS), unplanned re-attendance within a maximum of 72 hours, mortality/morbidity, and number of unintended incidents were the most highlighted performance measures that related directly to the patient. Performance measures related to employees were only stated in two of the 14 included articles.

conclusionsA total of 55 ED performance measures were identified. ED time intervals were the most recommended performance measures followed by patient centeredness and safety performance measures. ED employee related performance measures were rarely mentioned in the investigated literature. The study's results allow for advancement towards improved performance measurement and standardised assessment across EDs.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalQuality ImprovementEmergency Service, HospitalEuropeHumansPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingTotal Quality Management

Identifiers

PMID23938117
PMCPMC3750595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.