ArticleBMC health services research2013
Into the abyss: diabetes process of care indicators and outcomes of defaulters from a Canadian tertiary care multidisciplinary diabetes clinic.
Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors affecting follow-up non-attendance in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a systematic review.Singapore medical journal · 2019Pooled it
- Relationship between medication use and non-attendance (missed appointment) from primary care visits among people with type 2 diabetes: The Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial-2 Large-Scale Trial 006 (J-DOIT2-LT006).Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Trial
- Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Factors associated with nonattendance at annual diabetes check-up in Ningbo, China: a case-control study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- A qualitative study exploring the barriers to attending structured education programmes among adults with type 2 diabetes.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The Impact of Telemonitoring on Improving Glycemic and Metabolic Control in Previously Lost-to-Follow-Up Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Interventional Study in the United Arab Emirates.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Article
- Long-term training in diabetes-related knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practice among diabetes liaison nurses.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Transfer of primary care patients receiving chronic care: the next step in the continuum of care.International health · 2019Review
- Predictors of loss to follow up among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending a private not for profit urban diabetes clinic in Uganda - a descriptive retrospective study.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Association between Continuity of Care and the Onset of Thyroid Disorder among Diabetes Patients in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- [The way from cost approval to bariatric surgery : Analysis of resource utilization in a maximum care hospital].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017Article
- Article
- Effects of continuity of care on hospital admission in patients with type 2 diabetes: analysis of nationwide insurance data.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Quality of diabetes care at outpatient clinic, sultan qaboos university hospital.Oman medical journal · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuity of care is essential for good quality diabetes management. We recently found that 46% of patients defaulted from care (had no contact with the clinic for 18 months after a follow-up appointment was ordered) in a Canadian multidisciplinary tertiary care diabetes clinic. The primary aim was to compare characteristics, diabetes processes of care, and outcomes from referral to within 1 year after leaving clinic or to the end of the follow-up period among those patients who defaulted, were discharged or were retained in the clinic.
methodsRetrospective cohort study of 193 patients referred to the Foustanellas Endocrine and Diabetes Center (FEDC) for type 2 diabetes from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005. The FEDC is the primary academic referral centre for the Ottawa Region and provides multidisciplinary diabetes management. Defaulters (mean age 58.5 ± 12.5 year, 60% M) were compared to patients who were retained in the clinic (mean age 61.4 ± 10.47 years, 49% M) and those who were formally discharged (mean age 61.5 ± 13.2 years, 53.3% M). The chart audit population was then individually linked on an individual patient basis for laboratory testing, physician visits billed through OHIP, hospitalizations and emergency room visits using Ontario health card numbers to health administrative data from the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care at the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences (ICES).
resultsRetained and defaulted patients had significantly longer duration of diabetes, more microvascular complications, were more likely to be on insulin and less likely to have a HbA1c < 7.0% than patients discharged from clinic. A significantly lower proportion of patients who defaulted from tertiary care received recommended monitoring for their diabetes (HbA1c measurements, lipid measurements, and periodic eye examinations), despite no difference in median number of visits to a primary care provider (PCP). Emergency room visits were numerically higher in the defaulters group.
conclusionsPatients defaulting from a tertiary care diabetes hospital do not receive the recommended monitoring for their diabetes management despite attending PCP appointments. Efforts should be made to minimize defaulting in this group of individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.