ArticleTrials2013
Consent, including advanced consent, of older adults to research in care homes: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views in South Wales.
Article in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Challenges of conducting research in long-term care facilities: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2018Pooled it
- Maximising inclusivity in care home research: Lessons learned from the AFRI-c randomised controlled trial.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2025Trial
- A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial of a Novel Approach to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Care Home Residents: Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of the GET READY Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Barriers and facilitators to recruiting older adult care home residents into clinical trials of medicines and vaccines: a scoping review.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Informed consent and risk communication challenges in antimicrobial clinical trials: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- "Research happens a lot in other settings-so why not here?" A qualitative interview study of stakeholders' views about advance planning for care home residents' research participation.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Planning ahead for research participation: survey of public and professional stakeholders' views about the acceptability and feasibility of advance research planning.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Identifying barriers and facilitators to the inclusion of older adults living in UK care homes in research: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Participants' Comprehension of the Informed Consent in an Epidemiological Study on Dementia Prevalence: A Qualitative Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Mission (im)possible: Engaging care homes, staff and residents in research studies.Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls · 2020Article
- Healthcare professionals' understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey.Journal of medical ethics · 2018Article
- [Informed consent process in clinical trials: Insights of researchers, patients and general practitioners].Atencion primaria · 2016Article
- Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on 'evidence biased' medicine.BMC medical ethics · 2016Article
- Assessing physical and cognitive function of older adults in continuing care retirement communities: who are we recruiting?Contemporary clinical trials · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCare home residents, especially those lacking capacity to provide consent for themselves, are frequently excluded from research, thus limiting generalisability of study findings. We set out to explore stakeholders' views about the ethical and practical challenges associated with recruiting care home residents into research studies.
methodsQualitative individual interviews with care home residents (n = 14), their relatives (n = 14), and general practitioners (GPs) (n = 10), and focus groups (n = 2) with care home staff. Interviews focused on the issues of older adults consenting to research in care homes, including advanced consent, in general and through reference to a particular study on the use of probiotics to prevent Antibiotic Associated Diarrhoea. Data were analysed using a thematic approach incorporating themes that had been identified in advance, and themes derived from the data. Researchers discussed evidence for themes, and reached consensus on the final themes.
resultsRespondents were generally accepting of low risk observational studies and slightly less accepting of low risk randomised trials of medicinal products. Although respondents identified some practical barriers to informed consent, consenting arrangements were considered workable. Residents and relatives varied in the amount of detail they wanted included in information sheets and consent discussions, but were generally satisfied that an advanced consent model was acceptable and appropriate. Opinions differed about what should happen should residents lose capacity during a research study.
conclusionsResearch staff should be mindful of research guidance and ensure that they have obtained an appropriate level of informed consent without overwhelming the participant with unnecessary detail. For research involving medicinal products, research staff should also be more explicit when recruiting that consent is still valid should an older person lose capacity during a trial provided the individual did not previously state a wish to be withdrawn if they lose capacity, and provided they do not indicate objection or resistance after loss of capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.