Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23937766›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2013

Improving practice in community-based settings: a randomized trial of supervision - study protocol.

Shannon Dorsey, Michael D Pullmann, Esther Deblinger, Lucy Berliner, Suzanne E Kerns, Kelly Thompson, Jürgen Unützer, John R Weisz, Ann F Garland

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01800266 (Improving Practice in Community-based Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01800266 naunknown statusnot on this map

Improving Practice in Community-based Settings: A Randomized Trial of Supervision Strategies

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2012 to 2017Enrolled1,280ConditionsPost Traumatic Stress, Overall Functioning, Clinician Fidelity, SupervisionArmsSupervision Practices of TF-CBT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shannon DorseyDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, 335 Guthrie Hall, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. dorsey2@uw.edu
Michael D Pullmann
Esther Deblinger
Lucy Berliner
Suzanne E Kerns
Kelly Thompson
Jürgen Unützer
John R Weisz
Ann F Garland

Funding

IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IRI-MHSR25MH080916 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Byron James Powell · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Improving Practice in Community-based Settings: A Randomized Trial of SupervisionR01MH095749 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DORSEY, SHANNON · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095749NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based treatments for child mental health problems are not consistently available in public mental health settings. Expanding availability requires workforce training. However, research has demonstrated that training alone is not sufficient for changing provider behavior, suggesting that ongoing intervention-specific supervision or consultation is required. Supervision is notably under-investigated, particularly as provided in public mental health. The degree to which supervision in this setting includes 'gold standard' supervision elements from efficacy trials (e.g., session review, model fidelity, outcome monitoring, skill-building) is unknown. The current federally-funded investigation leverages the Washington State Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Initiative to describe usual supervision practices and test the impact of systematic implementation of gold standard supervision strategies on treatment fidelity and clinical outcomes. METHODS/

designThe study has two phases. We will conduct an initial descriptive study (Phase I) of supervision practices within public mental health in Washington State followed by a randomized controlled trial of gold standard supervision strategies (Phase II), with randomization at the clinician level (i.e., supervisors provide both conditions). Study participants will be 35 supervisors and 130 clinicians in community mental health centers. We will enroll one child per clinician in Phase I (N = 130) and three children per clinician in Phase II (N = 390). We use a multi-level mixed within- and between-subjects longitudinal design. Audio recordings of supervision and therapy sessions will be collected and coded throughout both phases. Child outcome data will be collected at the beginning of treatment and at three and six months into treatment. DISCUSSION: This study will provide insight into how supervisors can optimally support clinicians delivering evidence-based treatments. Phase I will provide descriptive information, currently unavailable in the literature, about commonly used supervision strategies in community mental health. The Phase II randomized controlled trial of gold standard supervision strategies is, to our knowledge, the first experimental study of gold standard supervision strategies in community mental health and will yield needed information about how to leverage supervision to improve clinician fidelity and client outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01800266.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildCognitive Behavioral TherapyCommunity Mental Health CentersCommunity Mental Health ServicesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInterprofessional RelationsMental DisordersTreatment OutcomeWashington

Identifiers

PMID23937766
PMCPMC3751139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.