Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23937626›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2014

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

F Leypoldt, K-P Wandinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: For Cancer Patients.Cancer management and research · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Immune checkpoint inhibitors-related encephalitis in melanoma and non-melanoma cancer patients: a single center experience.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F LeypoldtDepartment of Neurology, University Medical-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg; Josep Dalmau's Laboratory, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
K-P Wandinger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are immune-mediated erroneous attacks on the central or peripheral nervous systems, or both, directed originally against the tumour itself. They have been known for more than 40 years, but recently the discovery of new subgroups of paraneoplastic encephalitis syndromes with a remarkably good response to immune therapy has ignited new clinical and scientific interest. Knowledge of these subgroups and their associated autoantibodies is important in therapeutic decision-making. However, the abundance of new autoantibodies and syndromes can be confusing. This review paper summarizes current knowledge and new developments in the field of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes, their classification, pathophysiology and treatment.

Indexed as

HumansParaneoplastic Syndromes, Nervous Systemanti-NMDA receptor encephalitislimbic encephalitisparaneoplastic antibodiesparaneoplastic syndromes

Identifiers

PMID23937626
PMCPMC3927895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.