ArticleArchives of pathology & laboratory medicine2014
A call to standardize preanalytic data elements for biospecimens.
Article in Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of formalin fixation on mismatch repair protein evaluation by immunohistochemistry.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence applied to breast pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022Review
- Accuracy of whole slide image based image analysis is adversely affected by preanalytical factors such as stained tissue slide and paraffin block age.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022Article
- Storage Conditions and Immunoreactivity of Breast Cancer Subtyping Markers in Tissue Microarray Sections.Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM · 2020Article
- Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Assess Hormonal Status From Tissue Microarrays in Patients With Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- The College of American Pathologists Biorepository Accreditation Program: Results from the First 5 Years.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2018Article
- Epitope recognition in the human-pig comparison model on fixed and embedded material.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2015Article
- Biobanking in genomic medicine.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2015Review
- Evaluating the effects of preanalytical variables on the stability of the human plasma proteome.Analytical biochemistry · 2015Article
- Critical roles of specimen type and temperature before and during fixation in the detection of phosphoproteins in breast cancer tissues.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2015Article
- Genomic assays for Epstein-Barr virus-positive gastric adenocarcinoma.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2015Review
- Translational research in oncology--10 years of progress and future prospects.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2014Review
- Next-gen immunohistochemistry.Nature methods · 2014Article
- Proceedings of the 1st Puerto Rico Biobanking Workshop.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2014Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextBiospecimens must have appropriate clinical annotation (data) to ensure optimal quality for both patient care and research. Clinical preanalytic variables are the focus of this study.
objectiveTo define the essential preanalytic variables (data fields) that should be attached to every collected biospecimen and to provide a complete list of such variables, along with their relative importance, which can vary, depending on downstream use, institutional needs, and information technology capabilities.
designThe College of American Pathologists Diagnostic Intelligence and Health Information Technology Committee sponsored a Biorepository Working Group to develop a ranked list of the preanalytic variables for annotating biospecimens. Members of the working group were experts in anatomic, clinical, and molecular pathology; biobanking; medical informatics; and accreditation. Several members had experience with federal government programs, such as the National Cancer Institute's Biospecimens and Biorepository Branch and the National Cancer Institute's Community Cancer Center Program. Potential preanalytic variables were identified and ranked along with available supporting evidence, definitions, and potential negative effects if the variable was not attached to the biospecimen. Additional national and international stakeholders reviewed the draft manuscript.
resultsThe ranked listing of 170 preanalytic variables produced can be used as a guide for site-specific implementation into patient care and/or research biorepository processes. Conclusions.-In our collective experience, it is often difficult to choose which of the many preanalytic variables to attach to any specific set of biospecimens used for patient care and/or research. The provided ranked list should aid in the selection of preanalytic variables for a given biospecimen collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.