Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23937325›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2013

Perceived facilitators and barriers in diabetes care: a qualitative study among health care professionals in the Netherlands.

Lieke Gm Raaijmakers, Femke Jm Hamers, Marloes K Martens, Charlotte Bagchus, Nanne K de Vries, Stef Pj Kremers

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03453970 (Effectiveness of a Diabetes Education Program Based on Tailored Interventions in the Andalusian Public Health and Social System), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03453970 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Diabetes Education Program Based on Tailored Interventions in the Andalusian Public Health and Social System (Edep-Ti Study).

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalagaRan2018 to 2021Enrolled410ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsTherapeutic Education Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lieke Gm RaaijmakersDepartment of Health Promotion, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. lieke.raaijmakers@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Femke Jm Hamers
Marloes K Martens
Charlotte Bagchus
Nanne K de Vries
Stef Pj Kremers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need to understand barriers to the implementation of health care innovations in daily practice has been widely documented, but perceived facilitators and barriers in diabetes care by Dutch health care professionals remain unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate these factors among health care professionals (HCPs) using a qualitative research design.

methodsData were collected from 18 semi-structured interviews with HCPs from all professions relevant to diabetes care. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and the data were analyzed using NVivo 8.0.

resultsMajor facilitators were the more prominent role of the practice nurses and diabetes nurses in diabetes care, benchmarking, the Care Standard (CS) of the Netherlands Diabetes federation and multidisciplinary collaboration, although collaboration with certain professional groups (i.e. dieticians, physical therapists and pharmacists), as well as the collaboration between primary and secondary care, could still be improved. The bundled payment system for the funding of diabetes care and the role of the health insurers were perceived as major barriers within the health care system. Other important barriers were reported to be the lack of motivation among patients and the lack of awareness of lifestyle programs and prevention initiatives for diabetes patients among professionals.

conclusionsOrganizational changes in diabetes care, as a result of the increased attention given to management continuity of care, have led to an increased need for multidisciplinary collaboration within and between health care sectors (e.g. public health, primary care and secondary care). To date, daily routines for shared care are still sub-optimal and improvements in facilities, such as registration systems, should be implemented to further optimize communication and exchange of information.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsAdultBenchmarkingChronic DiseaseContinuity of Patient CareDiabetes MellitusDisease ManagementFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOrganizational Innovation

Identifiers

PMID23937325
PMCPMC3751909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.