Forensic familial searching: scientific and social implications.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Challenges in selecting admixture models and marker sets to infer genetic ancestry in a Brazilian admixed population.Scientific reports · 2022
   Article
2. Human-Genetic Ancestry Inference and False Positives in Forensic Familial Searching.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
   Article
3. Identity inference of genomic data using long-range familial searches.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2018
   Article
4. Genetic Diversity and Societally Important Disparities.Genetics · 2015
   Review
5. The influence of relatives on the efficiency and error rate of familial searching.PloS one · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as