Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23936852›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2013

Hyperpolarization-activated current, If, in mathematical models of rabbit sinoatrial node pacemaker cells.

Arie O Verkerk, Ronald Wilders

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bidirectional flow of the funny current (IProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Isoform-specific regulation of HCN4 channels by a family of endoplasmic reticulum proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  4. Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  5. Cardiac Pacemaker Activity and Aging.Annual review of physiology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arie O VerkerkDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology and Physiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald Wilders

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A typical feature of sinoatrial (SA) node pacemaker cells is the presence of an ionic current that activates upon hyperpolarization. The role of this hyperpolarization-activated current, If, which is also known as the "funny current" or "pacemaker current," in the spontaneous pacemaker activity of SA nodal cells remains a matter of intense debate. Whereas some conclude that If plays a fundamental role in the generation of pacemaker activity and its rate control, others conclude that the role of If is limited to a modest contribution to rate control. The ongoing debate is often accompanied with arguments from computer simulations, either to support one's personal view or to invalidate that of the antagonist. In the present paper, we review the various mathematical descriptions of If that have been used in computer simulations and compare their strikingly different characteristics with our experimental data. We identify caveats and propose a novel model for If based on our experimental data.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPacemaker, ArtificialSinoatrial NodeAnimalsComputer SimulationRabbits

Identifiers

PMID23936852
PMCPMC3722861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.