ArticlePloS one2013
First evidence of sternal wound biofilm following cardiac surgery.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection.Advances in wound care · 2024Trial
- The wound microbiome associated with deep sternal wound infection: a scoping review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Article
- Alpha-Toxin Contributes to Biofilm Formation among Staphylococcus aureus Wound Isolates.Toxins · 2018Article
- Is sternal rewiring mandatory in surgical treatment of deep sternal wound infections?Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Use of antibiotic impregnated resorbable beads reduces pressure ulcer recurrence: A retrospective analysis.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2018Article
- A surfactant polymer dressing potentiates antimicrobial efficacy in biofilm disruption.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A Formidable Foe Is Sabotaging Your Results: What You Should Know about Biofilms and Wound Healing.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2017Article
- An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue.BMC research notes · 2016Article
- Successful treatment of biofilm infections using shock waves combined with antibiotic therapy.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- A Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Lowers Cost of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.Advances in wound care · 2015Article
- Clinical Biofilms: A Challenging Frontier in Wound Care.Advances in wound care · 2015Review
- Article
- Mixed-species biofilm compromises wound healing by disrupting epidermal barrier function.The Journal of pathology · 2014Article
- The visualization of biofilms in chronic diabetic foot wounds using routine diagnostic microscopy methods.Journal of diabetes research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Management of deep sternal wound infection (SWI), a serious complication after cardiac surgery with high morbidity and mortality incidence, requires invasive procedures such as, debridement with primary closure or myocutaneous flap reconstruction along with use of broad spectrum antibiotics. The purpose of this clinical series is to investigate the presence of biofilm in patients with deep SWI. A biofilm is a complex microbial community in which bacteria attach to a biological or non-biological surface and are embedded in a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance. Biofilm related infections represent a major clinical challenge due to their resistance to both host immune defenses and standard antimicrobial therapies. Candidates for this clinical series were patients scheduled for a debridement procedure of an infected sternal wound after a cardiac surgery. Six patients with SWI were recruited in the study. All cases had marked dehiscence of all layers of the wound down to the sternum with no signs of healing after receiving broad spectrum antibiotics post-surgery. After consenting patients, tissue and/or extracted stainless steel wires were collected during the debridement procedure. Debrided tissues examined by Gram stain showed large aggregations of Gram positive cocci. Immuno-fluorescent staining of the debrided tissues using a specific antibody against staphylococci demonstrated the presence of thick clumps of staphylococci colonizing the wound bed. Evaluation of tissue samples with scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging showed three-dimensional aggregates of these cocci attached to the wound surface. More interestingly, SEM imaging of the extracted wires showed attachment of cocci aggregations to the wire metal surface. These observations along with the clinical presentation of the patients provide the first evidence that supports the presence of biofilm in such cases. Clinical introduction of the biofilm infection concept in deep SWI may advance the current management strategies from standard antimicrobial therapy to anti-biofilm strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.