Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23936257›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Glocal clinical registries: pacemaker registry design and implementation for global and local integration--methodology and case study.

Kátia Regina da Silva, Roberto Costa, Elizabeth Sartori Crevelari, Marianna Sobral Lacerda, Caio Marcos de Moraes Albertini, Martino Martinelli Filho, José Eduardo Santana, João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci, Ricardo Pietrobon, Jacson V Barros

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Need of informatics in designing interoperable clinical registries.International journal of medical informatics · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Desiderata for an authoritative Representation of MeSH in RDF.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kátia Regina da SilvaHeart Institute, InCor, Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. katia.regina@incor.usp.br
Roberto Costa
Elizabeth Sartori Crevelari
Marianna Sobral Lacerda
Caio Marcos de Moraes Albertini
Martino Martinelli Filho
José Eduardo Santana
João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci
Ricardo Pietrobon
Jacson V Barros

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to apply standard and interoperable solutions for implementing and managing medical registries as well as aggregate, reproduce, and access data sets from legacy formats and platforms to advanced standard formats and operating systems are crucial for both clinical healthcare and biomedical research settings. PURPOSE: Our study describes a reproducible, highly scalable, standard framework for a device registry implementation addressing both local data quality components and global linking problems. METHODS AND

resultsWe developed a device registry framework involving the following steps: (1) Data standards definition and representation of the research workflow, (2) Development of electronic case report forms using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture), (3) Data collection according to the clinical research workflow and, (4) Data augmentation by enriching the registry database with local electronic health records, governmental database and linked open data collections, (5) Data quality control and (6) Data dissemination through the registry Web site. Our registry adopted all applicable standardized data elements proposed by American College Cardiology / American Heart Association Clinical Data Standards, as well as variables derived from cardiac devices randomized trials and Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium. Local interoperability was performed between REDCap and data derived from Electronic Health Record system. The original data set was also augmented by incorporating the reimbursed values paid by the Brazilian government during a hospitalization for pacemaker implantation. By linking our registry to the open data collection repository Linked Clinical Trials (LinkedCT) we found 130 clinical trials which are potentially correlated with our pacemaker registry.

conclusionThis study demonstrates how standard and reproducible solutions can be applied in the implementation of medical registries to constitute a re-usable framework. Such approach has the potential to facilitate data integration between healthcare and research settings, also being a useful framework to be used in other biomedical registries.

Indexed as

SoftwareBrazilClinical Trials as TopicData CollectionElectronic Health RecordsHumansPacemaker, ArtificialQuality ControlRegistriesResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID23936257
PMCPMC3723676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.