Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23936251›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Physical predictors of cognitive performance in healthy older adults: a cross-sectional analysis.

Christiaan G Blankevoort, Erik J A Scherder, Martijn B Wieling, Tibor Hortobágyi, Wiebo H Brouwer, Reint H Geuze, Marieke J G van Heuvelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dynamic Useful Field of View Training to Enhance Older Adults' Cognitive and Motor Function: A Pilot Study.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Distinct Trajectories of Individual Physical Performance Measures Across 9 Years in 60- to 70-Year-Old Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Age-Varying Relationships Between Physical Function and Cognition in Older Adulthood.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2019
    Article
  16. Cognition, Health, and Well-Being in a Rural Sub-Saharan African Population.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christiaan G BlankevoortCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. c.g.blankevoort@gmail.com
Erik J A Scherder
Martijn B Wieling
Tibor Hortobágyi
Wiebo H Brouwer
Reint H Geuze
Marieke J G van Heuvelen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is ample evidence that physical and cognitive performance are related, but the results of studies investigating this relationship show great variability. Both physical performance and cognitive performance are constructs consisting of several subdomains, but it is presently unknown if the relationship between physical and cognitive performance depends on subdomain of either construct and whether gender and age moderate this relationship. The aim of this study is to identify the strongest physical predictors of cognitive performance, to determine the specificity of these predictors for various cognitive subdomains, and to examine gender and age as potential moderators of the relationship between physical and cognitive performance in a sample of community-dwelling older adults. In total, 98 men and 122 women (average age 74.0±5.6 years) were subjected to a series of performance-based physical fitness and neuropsychological tests. Muscle strength, balance, functional reach, and walking ability (combined score of walking speed and endurance) were considered to predict cognitive performance across several domains (i.e. memory, verbal attention, visual attention, set-shifting, visuo-motor attention, inhibition and intelligence). Results showed that muscle strength was a significant predictor of cognitive performance for men and women. Walking ability and balance were significant predictors of cognitive performance for men, whereas only walking ability was significant for women. We did not find a moderating effect of age, nor did we find support for a differential effect of the physical predictors across different cognitive subdomains. In summary, our results showed a significant relationship between cognitive and physical performance, with a moderating effect of gender.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23936251
PMCPMC3728317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.