ArticlePloS one2013
Phylogenetic relationships and species delimitation in pinus section trifoliae inferrred from plastid DNA.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural selection and recombination interact to structure genome-wide variation in pines.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Needle length in pines as a key trait regulating hydraulic resistance.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- DNA Barcoding Provides Taxonomic Clues for Identifying Five EndangeredPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A novel seed cone ofPlant diversity · 2023Article
- Plastome evolution in the East Asian lobelias (Lobelioideae) using phylogenomic and comparative analyses.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Comparative Genomic Analysis Uncovers the Chloroplast Genome Variation and Phylogenetic Relationships ofBiomolecules · 2022Article
- Coalescent-based species delimitation in North American pinyon pines using low-copy nuclear genes and plastomes.American journal of botany · 2022Article
- A Comparative Analysis of the Chloroplast Genomes of FourFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- New Insight into Taxonomy of European Mountain Pines,Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Phylogenomic and ecological analyses reveal the spatiotemporal evolution of global pines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Spatial phylogenetics of the native woody plant species in Hainan, China.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes in Vasconcellea pubescens A.DC. and Carica papaya L.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Comparing and phylogenetic analysis chloroplast genome of three Achyranthes species.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- TallPeerJ · 2020Article
- Exome Resequencing Reveals Evolutionary History, Genomic Diversity, and Targets of Selection in the Conifers Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Article
- Complete chloroplast genome of Camellia japonica genome structures, comparative and phylogenetic analysis.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent diversification followed by secondary contact and hybridization may explain complex patterns of intra- and interspecific morphological and genetic variation in the North American hard pines (Pinus section Trifoliae), a group of approximately 49 tree species distributed in North and Central America and the Caribbean islands. We concatenated five plastid DNA markers for an average of 3.9 individuals per putative species and assessed the suitability of the five regions as DNA bar codes for species identification, species delimitation, and phylogenetic reconstruction. The ycf1 gene accounted for the greatest proportion of the alignment (46.9%), the greatest proportion of variable sites (74.9%), and the most unique sequences (75 haplotypes). Phylogenetic analysis recovered clades corresponding to subsections Australes, Contortae, and Ponderosae. Sequences for 23 of the 49 species were monophyletic and sequences for another 9 species were paraphyletic. Morphologically similar species within subsections usually grouped together, but there were exceptions consistent with incomplete lineage sorting or introgression. Bayesian relaxed molecular clock analyses indicated that all three subsections diversified relatively recently during the Miocene. The general mixed Yule-coalescent method gave a mixed model estimate of only 22 or 23 evolutionary entities for the plastid sequences, which corresponds to less than half the 49 species recognized based on morphological species assignments. Including more unique haplotypes per species may result in higher estimates, but low mutation rates, recent diversification, and large effective population sizes may limit the effectiveness of this method to detect evolutionary entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.