Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23935910›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Targeting imperfect vaccines against drug-resistance determinants: a strategy for countering the rise of drug resistance.

Regina Joice, Marc Lipsitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Confronting Tigecycline-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  4. Microbiome as a tool and a target in the effort to address antimicrobial resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Metazoan Parasite Vaccines: Present Status and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Regina JoiceDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Marc Lipsitch

Funding

Understanding and controlling antibiotic resistanceU54GM088558 · NIGMS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HANAGE, WILLIAM · 2009 to 2018
$26.4M
Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases and BiodefenseT32AI007535 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI GRAD, YONATAN H, MURRAY, MEGAN B · 1998 to 2025
$4.8M
IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN PUBLIC HEALTHT32AI007638 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI RUBIN, ERIC J. · 2000 to 2014
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007535NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007638NIGMS NIH HHS 1 U54 GM088558NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM088558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in major pathogens is outpacing discovery of new antimicrobial classes. Vaccines mitigate the effect of antimicrobial resistance by reducing the need for treatment, but vaccines for many drug-resistant pathogens remain undiscovered or have limited efficacy, in part because some vaccines selectively favor pathogen strains that escape vaccine-induced immunity. A strain with even a modest advantage in vaccinated hosts can have high fitness in a population with high vaccine coverage, which can offset a strong selection pressure such as antimicrobial use that occurs in a small fraction of hosts. We propose a strategy to target vaccines against drug-resistant pathogens, by using resistance-conferring proteins as antigens in multicomponent vaccines. Resistance determinants may be weakly immunogenic, offering only modest specific protection against resistant strains. Therefore, we assess here how varying the specific efficacy of the vaccine against resistant strains would affect the proportion of drug-resistant vs. -sensitive strains population-wide for three pathogens--Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and influenza virus--in which drug resistance is a problem. Notably, if such vaccines confer even slightly higher protection (additional efficacy between 1% and 8%) against resistant variants than sensitive ones, they may be an effective tool in controlling the rise of resistant strains, given current levels of use for many antimicrobial agents. We show that the population-wide impact of such vaccines depends on the additional effect on resistant strains and on the overall effect (against all strains). Resistance-conferring accessory gene products or resistant alleles of essential genes could be valuable as components of vaccines even if their specific protective effect is weak.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAntigens, BacterialAntigens, ViralBacterial VaccinesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialDrug Resistance, ViralHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesOrthomyxoviridaePneumococcal InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniaeVaccines, SubunitAntigens, BacterialAntigens, ViralBacterial VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID23935910
PMCPMC3723804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.