Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23935865›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Detection of VEGF-A(xxx)b isoforms in human tissues.

David O Bates, Athina Mavrou, Yan Qiu, James G Carter, Maryam Hamdollah-Zadeh, Shaney Barratt, Melissa V Gammons, Ann B Millar, Andrew H J Salmon, Sebastian Oltean and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Alternative Splicing in Angiogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  14. VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) and Fibrotic Lung Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Molecular Pharmacology of VEGF-A Isoforms: Binding and Signalling at VEGFR2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. A computational analysis of pro-angiogenic therapies for peripheral artery disease.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Systems Pharmacology of VEGF165b in Peripheral Artery Disease.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David O BatesMicrovascular Research Laboratories, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. David.Bates@nottingham.ac.uk
Athina Mavrou
Yan Qiu
James G Carter
Maryam Hamdollah-Zadeh
Shaney Barratt
Melissa V Gammons
Ann B Millar
Andrew H J Salmon
Sebastian Oltean
Steven J Harper
University of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilBritish Heart Foundation PG/11/20/28792Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council G0600920Medical Research Council G0802829Medical Research Council G1002073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A (VEGF-A) can be generated as multiple isoforms by alternative splicing. Two families of isoforms have been described in humans, pro-angiogenic isoforms typified by VEGF-A165a, and anti-angiogenic isoforms typified by VEGF-A165b. The practical determination of expression levels of alternative isoforms of the same gene may be complicated by experimental protocols that favour one isoform over another, and the use of specific positive and negative controls is essential for the interpretation of findings on expression of the isoforms. Here we address some of the difficulties in experimental design when investigating alternative splicing of VEGF isoforms, and discuss the use of appropriate control paradigms. We demonstrate why use of specific control experiments can prevent assumptions that VEGF-A165b is not present, when in fact it is. We reiterate, and confirm previously published experimental design protocols that demonstrate the importance of using positive controls. These include using known target sequences to show that the experimental conditions are suitable for PCR amplification of VEGF-A165b mRNA for both q-PCR and RT-PCR and to ensure that mispriming does not occur. We also provide evidence that demonstrates that detection of VEGF-A165b protein in mice needs to be tightly controlled to prevent detection of mouse IgG by a secondary antibody. We also show that human VEGF165b protein can be immunoprecipitated from cultured human cells and that immunoprecipitating VEGF-A results in protein that is detected by VEGF-A165b antibody. These findings support the conclusion that more information on the biology of VEGF-A165b isoforms is required, and confirm the importance of the experimental design in such investigations, including the use of specific positive and negative controls.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingGene AmplificationGene Expression ProfilingAnimalsAntibodiesAntibody SpecificityBlotting, WesternCell LineCell Line, TumorDNA PrimersHumansImmunoprecipitationMiceProtein IsoformsReference StandardsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAntibodiesDNA PrimersProtein IsoformsRNA, MessengerVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID23935865
PMCPMC3729684
OpenAlexW1898885736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.