Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23935651›Full record

ReviewClinical & developmental immunology2013

Neonatal host defense against Staphylococcal infections.

Melanie R Power Coombs, Kenny Kronforst, Ofer Levy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & developmental immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Epidemiology and clinical presentation of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in children under 5 years of age admitted to the Manhiça District Hospital, Mozambique, 2001-2019.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Prevalence ofSouthern African journal of infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Melanie R Power CoombsPathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kenny Kronforst
Ofer Levy
Dalhousie University · CAHarvard University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Modeling distinct neonatal purine metabolism to inform vaccine developmentR01AI100135 · NIAID · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI LEVY, OFER · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI100135NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI100135-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm infants are especially susceptible to late-onset sepsis that is often due to Gram-positive bacterial infections resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality. Herein, we will describe neonatal innate immunity to Staphylococcus spp. comparing differences between preterm and full-term newborns with adults. Newborn innate immunity is distinct demonstrating diminished skin integrity, impaired Th1-polarizing responses, low complement levels, and diminished expression of plasma antimicrobial proteins and peptides, especially in preterm newborns. Characterization of distinct aspects of the neonatal immune response is defining novel approaches to enhance host defense to prevent and/or treat staphylococcal infection in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusToll-Like ReceptorsToll-Like Receptors

Identifiers

PMID23935651
PMCPMC3722842
OpenAlexW2114300778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.