ArticlePLoS genetics2013
The conditional nature of genetic interactions: the consequences of wild-type backgrounds on mutational interactions in a genome-wide modifier screen.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning identifies novel signatures of antifungal drug resistance in Saccharomycotina yeasts.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Mendelian Randomization Methods for Causal Inference: Estimands, Identification and Inference.Statistics in medicine · 2026Review
- scCOSMIX: A Mixed-Effects Framework for Differential Coexpression and Transcriptional Interactions Modeling in Single-Cell RNA-Seq.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Genetic suppression interactions are highly conserved across genetically diverse yeast isolates.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Genome-scale analysis of interactions between genetic perturbations and natural variation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Genome-scale analysis of interactions between genetic perturbations and natural variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Model Organism Modifier (MOM): a user-friendly Galaxy workflow to detect modifiers from genome sequencing data using Caenorhabditis elegans.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Unveiling the vulnerabilities of synthetic lethality in triple-negative breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023Review
- Leveraging the genetic correlation between traits improves the detection of epistasis in genome-wide association studies.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Phenotypic heterogeneity in human genetic diseases: ultrasensitivity-mediated threshold effects as a unifying molecular mechanism.Journal of biomedical science · 2023Review
- A deficiency screen of the 3rd chromosome for dominant modifiers of the Drosophila ER integral membrane protein, Jagunal.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Genetic basis of a spontaneous mutation's expressivity.Genetics · 2022Article
- The complex role of genetic background in shaping the effects of spontaneous and induced mutations.Yeast (Chichester, England) · 2021Review
- Development of synthetic lethality in cancer: molecular and cellular classification.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020Review
- The impact of the genetic background on gene deletion phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Molecular systems biology · 2019Article
- Unpredictable Effects of the Genetic Background of Transgenic Lines in Physiological Quantitative Traits.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Genetic interaction networks mediate individual statin drug response inNPJ systems biology and applications · 2019Article
- Genetic Network Complexity Shapes Background-Dependent Phenotypic Expression.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2018Review
- How well do you know your mutation? Complex effects of genetic background on expressivity, complementation, and ordering of allelic effects.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Naturally Segregating Variation atGenetics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phenotypic outcome of a mutation cannot be simply mapped onto the underlying DNA variant. Instead, the phenotype is a function of the allele, the genetic background in which it occurs and the environment where the mutational effects are expressed. While the influence of genetic background on the expressivity of individual mutations is recognized, its consequences on the interactions between genes, or the genetic network they form, is largely unknown. The description of genetic networks is essential for much of biology; yet if, and how, the topologies of such networks are influenced by background is unknown. Furthermore, a comprehensive examination of the background dependent nature of genetic interactions may lead to identification of novel modifiers of biological processes. Previous work in Drosophila melanogaster demonstrated that wild-type genetic background influences the effects of an allele of scalloped (sd), with respect to both its principal consequence on wing development and its interactions with a mutation in optomotor blind. In this study we address whether the background dependence of mutational interactions is a general property of genetic systems by performing a genome wide dominant modifier screen of the sd(E3) allele in two wild-type genetic backgrounds using molecularly defined deletions. We demonstrate that ~74% of all modifiers of the sd(E3) phenotype are background-dependent due in part to differential sensitivity to genetic perturbation. These background dependent interactions include some with qualitative differences in the phenotypic outcome, as well as instances of sign epistasis. This suggests that genetic interactions are often contingent on genetic background, with flexibility in genetic networks due to segregating variation in populations. Such background dependent effects can substantially alter conclusions about how genes influence biological processes, the potential for genetic screens in alternative wild-type backgrounds identifying new loci that contribute to trait expression, and the inferences of the topology of genetic networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.