ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Models of self-peptide sampling by developing T cells identify candidate mechanisms of thymic selection.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dysfunctional CD4 T cells in an oncovirus-specific TCR-transgenic in vivo model.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Bulk RNAseq Analysis of Cardiac Myosin-Specific CD4Biomedicines · 2025Article
- T Cell Development and Function.Rejuvenation research · 2023Review
- Development, ontogeny, and maintenance of TCRαβCurrent opinion in immunology · 2019Review
- Quantitative analysis reveals reciprocal regulations underlying recovery dynamics of thymocytes and thymic environment in mice.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Antigen-specific Treg cells in immunological tolerance: implications for allergic diseases.F1000Research · 2018Review
- Bacterial clearance reverses a skewed T-cell repertoire induced by Salmonella infection.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2015Article
- Lymphocyte repertoire selection and intracellular self/non-self-discrimination: historical overview.Immunology and cell biology · 2015Review
- Immune Tolerance Maintained by Cooperative Interactions between T Cells and Antigen Presenting Cells Shapes a Diverse TCR Repertoire.Frontiers in immunology · 2015Article
- Differential requirement for IL-2 and IL-15 during bifurcated development of thymic regulatory T cells.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2014Article
- The same self-peptide selects conventional and regulatory CD4⁺ T cells with identical antigen receptors.Nature communications · 2014Article
- The self-obsession of T cells: how TCR signaling thresholds affect fate 'decisions' and effector function.Nature immunology · 2014Review
- Positive and negative selection of the T cell repertoire: what thymocytes see (and don't see).Nature reviews. Immunology · 2014Review
- Theories and quantification of thymic selection.Frontiers in immunology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional and regulatory T cells develop in the thymus where they are exposed to samples of self-peptide MHC (pMHC) ligands. This probabilistic process selects for cells within a range of responsiveness that allows the detection of foreign antigen without excessive responses to self. Regulatory T cells are thought to lie at the higher end of the spectrum of acceptable self-reactivity and play a crucial role in the control of autoimmunity and tolerance to innocuous antigens. While many studies have elucidated key elements influencing lineage commitment, we still lack a full understanding of how thymocytes integrate signals obtained by sampling self-peptides to make fate decisions. To address this problem, we apply stochastic models of signal integration by T cells to data from a study quantifying the development of the two lineages using controllable levels of agonist peptide in the thymus. We find two models are able to explain the observations; one in which T cells continually re-assess fate decisions on the basis of multiple summed proximal signals from TCR-pMHC interactions; and another in which TCR sensitivity is modulated over time, such that contact with the same pMHC ligand may lead to divergent outcomes at different stages of development. Neither model requires that T(conv) and T(reg) are differentially susceptible to deletion or that the two lineages need qualitatively different signals for development, as have been proposed. We find additional support for the variable-sensitivity model, which is able to explain apparently paradoxical observations regarding the effect of partial and strong agonists on T(conv) and T(reg) development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.