Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23935465›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Models of self-peptide sampling by developing T cells identify candidate mechanisms of thymic selection.

Iren Bains, Hisse M van Santen, Benedict Seddon, Andrew J Yates

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. T Cell Development and Function.Rejuvenation research · 2023
    Review
  4. Development, ontogeny, and maintenance of TCRαβCurrent opinion in immunology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Iren BainsImmune Cell Biology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, United Kingdom.
Hisse M van Santen
Benedict Seddon
Andrew J Yates
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

Modeling the development, structure and regulation of T cell memoryR01AI093870 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW · PI YATES, ANDREW · 2011 to 2025
$5.9M
Medical Research Council MC_PC_13055Medical Research Council MC_U117573801Medical Research Council U11757380NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093870NIAID NIH HHS R01AI093870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional and regulatory T cells develop in the thymus where they are exposed to samples of self-peptide MHC (pMHC) ligands. This probabilistic process selects for cells within a range of responsiveness that allows the detection of foreign antigen without excessive responses to self. Regulatory T cells are thought to lie at the higher end of the spectrum of acceptable self-reactivity and play a crucial role in the control of autoimmunity and tolerance to innocuous antigens. While many studies have elucidated key elements influencing lineage commitment, we still lack a full understanding of how thymocytes integrate signals obtained by sampling self-peptides to make fate decisions. To address this problem, we apply stochastic models of signal integration by T cells to data from a study quantifying the development of the two lineages using controllable levels of agonist peptide in the thymus. We find two models are able to explain the observations; one in which T cells continually re-assess fate decisions on the basis of multiple summed proximal signals from TCR-pMHC interactions; and another in which TCR sensitivity is modulated over time, such that contact with the same pMHC ligand may lead to divergent outcomes at different stages of development. Neither model requires that T(conv) and T(reg) are differentially susceptible to deletion or that the two lineages need qualitatively different signals for development, as have been proposed. We find additional support for the variable-sensitivity model, which is able to explain apparently paradoxical observations regarding the effect of partial and strong agonists on T(conv) and T(reg) development.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell LineageMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMiceThymus GlandT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID23935465
PMCPMC3723501
OpenAlexW1996962455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.