ArticleNucleic acids research2013
BlackOPs: increasing confidence in variant detection through mappability filtering.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Human-specific gene expansions contribute to brain evolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- UNMASC: tumor-only variant calling with unmatched normal controls.NAR cancer · 2021Article
- Article
- Methods and role of minimal residual disease after stem cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2019Review
- Analysis of error profiles in deep next-generation sequencing data.Genome biology · 2019Article
- A map of constrained coding regions in the human genome.Nature genetics · 2019Article
- Minimal residual disease in acute myelogenous leukemia.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2017Review
- Whole exome association of rare deletions in multiplex oral cleft families.Genetic epidemiology · 2017Article
- Altered RNA editing in 3' UTR perturbs microRNA-mediated regulation of oncogenes and tumor-suppressors.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- SigFuge: single gene clustering of RNA-seq reveals differential isoform usage among cancer samples.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- cDNA hybrid capture improves transcriptome analysis on low-input and archived samples.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2014Article
- Integrated RNA and DNA sequencing improves mutation detection in low purity tumors.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying variants using high-throughput sequencing data is currently a challenge because true biological variants can be indistinguishable from technical artifacts. One source of technical artifact results from incorrectly aligning experimentally observed sequences to their true genomic origin ('mismapping') and inferring differences in mismapped sequences to be true variants. We developed BlackOPs, an open-source tool that simulates experimental RNA-seq and DNA whole exome sequences derived from the reference genome, aligns these sequences by custom parameters, detects variants and outputs a blacklist of positions and alleles caused by mismapping. Blacklists contain thousands of artifact variants that are indistinguishable from true variants and, for a given sample, are expected to be almost completely false positives. We show that these blacklist positions are specific to the alignment algorithm and read length used, and BlackOPs allows users to generate a blacklist specific to their experimental setup. We queried the dbSNP and COSMIC variant databases and found numerous variants indistinguishable from mapping errors. We demonstrate how filtering against blacklist positions reduces the number of potential false variants using an RNA-seq glioblastoma cell line data set. In summary, accounting for mapping-caused variants tuned to experimental setups reduces false positives and, therefore, improves genome characterization by high-throughput sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.