Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23935021›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2014

Normal karyotype is a poor prognostic factor in myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome: a retrospective, international study.

Marjolein Blink, Martin Zimmermann, Christine von Neuhoff, Dirk Reinhardt, Valerie de Haas, Henrik Hasle, Maureen M O'Brien, Batia Stark, Julie Tandonnet, Andrea Pession and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 16 institutions in 12 countries.

Marjolein Blinkc.m.zwaan@erasmusmc.nl.
Martin Zimmermann
Christine von Neuhoff
Dirk Reinhardt
Valerie de Haas
Henrik Hasle
Maureen M O'Brien
Batia Stark
Julie Tandonnet
Andrea Pession
Katerina Tousovska
Daniel K L Cheuk
Kazuko Kudo
Takashi Taga
Jeffrey E Rubnitz
Iren Haltrich
Walentyna Balwierz
Rob Pieters
Erik Forestier
Bertil Johansson
Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
C Michel Zwaan
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLKardiologie Frankfurt-Sachsenhausen · DEStichting Kinderoncologie Nederland · NLAarhus University Hospital · DKCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USJagiellonian University · PLLund University · SESchneider Children's Medical Center · ILSemmelweis University · HUShiga University of Medical Science · JPShizuoka Children's Hospital · JPSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUmeå University · SEUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome has a better prognosis than sporadic pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Most cases of myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome are characterized by additional cytogenetic changes besides the constitutional trisomy 21, but their potential prognostic impact is not known. We, therefore, conducted an international retrospective study of clinical characteristics, cytogenetics, treatment, and outcome of 451 children with myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome. All karyotypes were centrally reviewed before assigning patients to subgroups. The overall 7-year event-free survival for the entire cohort was 78% (± 2%), with the overall survival rate being 79% (± 2%), the cumulative incidence of relapse 12% (± 2%), and the cumulative incidence of toxic death 7% (± 1%). Outcome estimates showed large differences across the different cytogenetic subgroups. Based on the cumulative incidence of relapse, we could risk-stratify patients into two groups: cases with a normal karyotype (n=103) with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (21%± 4%) than cases with an aberrant karyotype (n=255) with a cumulative incidence of relapse of 9% (± 2%) (P=0.004). Multivariate analyses revealed that white blood cell count ≥ 20 × 10(9)/L and age >3 years were independent predictors for poor event-free survival, while normal karyotype independently predicted inferior overall survival, event-free survival, and relapse-free survival. In conclusion, this study showed large differences in outcome within patients with myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome and identified novel prognostic groups that predicted clinical outcome and hence may be used for stratification in future treatment protocols.

Indexed as

Down SyndromeLeukemia, MyeloidAbnormal KaryotypeChild, PreschoolChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Disease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID23935021
PMCPMC3912960
OpenAlexW1991333664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.