Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23934932›Full record

ArticleGenome research2013

Analysis and correction of crosstalk effects in pathway analysis.

Michele Donato, Zhonghui Xu, Alin Tomoiaga, James G Granneman, Robert G Mackenzie, Riyue Bao, Nandor Gabor Than, Peter H Westfall, Roberto Romero, Sorin Draghici

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AnBiomedicines · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michele DonatoComputer Science Department, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48084, USA;
Zhonghui Xu
Alin Tomoiaga
James G Granneman
Robert G Mackenzie
Riyue Bao
Nandor Gabor Than
Peter H Westfall
Roberto Romero
Sorin Draghici

Funding

The Role Of Subclinical Infection And Cytokines In Preterm ParturitionZIAHD002400 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI ROMERO, ROBERTO · 2009 to 2025
$254.4M
Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID P OLSON · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Analysis of Cellular Plasticity in White Adipose Tissue.R01DK062292 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI James G Granneman · 2003 to 2026
$7.6M
Analysis of Lipolytic Trafficking in Adipocytes.R01DK076629 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI James G Granneman, Christopher V Kelly · 2009 to 2026
$7.1M
Pathway-Guide: A novel tool for the analysis of signaling and metabolic pathwaysR42GM087013 · NIGMS · ADVAITA CORPORATION · PI DRAGHICI, SORIN · 2011 to 2013
$2.2M
Novel methods for the analysis of gene signaling pathways with applications in obR01DK089167 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DRAGHICI, SORIN · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
Analysis of Cellular Plasticity in White Adipose TissueR56DK062292 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GRANNEMAN, JAMES G · 2005 to 2022
$226k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062292NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK076629NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK089167NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK062292NIGMS NIH HHS R42 GM087013PHS HHS R01 RDK089167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the pathways that are significantly impacted in a given condition is a crucial step in understanding the underlying biological phenomena. All approaches currently available for this purpose calculate a P-value that aims to quantify the significance of the involvement of each pathway in the given phenotype. These P-values were previously thought to be independent. Here we show that this is not the case, and that many pathways can considerably affect each other's P-values through a "crosstalk" phenomenon. Although it is intuitive that various pathways could influence each other, the presence and extent of this phenomenon have not been rigorously studied and, most importantly, there is no currently available technique able to quantify the amount of such crosstalk. Here, we show that all three major categories of pathway analysis methods (enrichment analysis, functional class scoring, and topology-based methods) are severely influenced by crosstalk phenomena. Using real pathways and data, we show that in some cases pathways with significant P-values are not biologically meaningful, and that some biologically meaningful pathways with nonsignificant P-values become statistically significant when the crosstalk effects of other pathways are removed. We describe a technique able to detect, quantify, and correct crosstalk effects, as well as identify independent functional modules. We assessed this novel approach on data from four experiments involving three phenotypes and two species. This method is expected to allow a better understanding of individual experiment results, as well as a more refined definition of the existing signaling pathways for specific phenotypes.

Indexed as

Metabolic Networks and PathwaysSignal TransductionAdipose Tissue, WhiteAnimalsCervical RipeningCervix UteriComputational BiologyFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMiceModels, BiologicalPhenotypePregnancySpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID23934932
PMCPMC3814888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.