ArticleGenetics2013
A novel approach to estimating heterozygosity from low-coverage genome sequence.
Article in Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conspecific Scaffold-Level Genome Assembly Outperforms Heterospecific Chromosome-Level Assemblies for Assessing Genetic Indicators in a Threatened Marine Fish.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Merging High-Throughput, Amplicon-Based Second and Third Generation Sequencing Data: An Integrative and Modular Data Analysis Framework for Haplotype Prediction and Output Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Modeling Biases from Low-Pass Genome Sequencing to Enable Accurate Population Genetic Inferences.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Leveraging ancient DNA to uncover signals of natural selection in Europe lost due to admixture or drift.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Modeling biases from low-pass genome sequencing to enable accurate population genetic inferences.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Targeted phasing of 2-200 kilobase DNA fragments with a short-read sequencer and a single-tube linked-read library method.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Migratory behaviour is positively associated with genetic diversity in butterflies.Molecular ecology · 2023Article
- Article
- SECEDO: SNV-based subclone detection using ultra-low coverage single-cell DNA sequencing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- HaploMaker: An improved algorithm for rapid haplotype assembly of genomic sequences.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Elucidation of the speciation history of three sister species of crown-of-thorns starfish (Acanthaster spp.) based on genomic analysis.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2021Article
- Mapping co-ancestry connections between the genome of a Medieval individual and modern Europeans.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Longshot enables accurate variant calling in diploid genomes from single-molecule long read sequencing.Nature communications · 2019Article
- The presence and impact of reference bias on population genomic studies of prehistoric human populations.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Joint Estimates of Heterozygosity and Runs of Homozygosity for Modern and Ancient Samples.Genetics · 2019Article
- Genomic Selection in Aquaculture: Application, Limitations and Opportunities With Special Reference to Marine Shrimp and Pearl Oysters.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Article
- Dealing with paralogy in RADseq data: in silico detection and single nucleotide polymorphism validation inEcology and evolution · 2016Article
- Article
- Population genomics of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.): Comparative analysis of global accessions and Senegalese landraces.BMC genomics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput shotgun sequence data make it possible in principle to accurately estimate population genetic parameters without confounding by SNP ascertainment bias. One such statistic of interest is the proportion of heterozygous sites within an individual's genome, which is informative about inbreeding and effective population size. However, in many cases, the available sequence data of an individual are limited to low coverage, preventing the confident calling of genotypes necessary to directly count the proportion of heterozygous sites. Here, we present a method for estimating an individual's genome-wide rate of heterozygosity from low-coverage sequence data, without an intermediate step that calls genotypes. Our method jointly learns the shared allele distribution between the individual and a panel of other individuals, together with the sequencing error distributions and the reference bias. We show our method works well, first, by its performance on simulated sequence data and, second, on real sequence data where we obtain estimates using low-coverage data consistent with those from higher coverage. We apply our method to obtain estimates of the rate of heterozygosity for 11 humans from diverse worldwide populations and through this analysis reveal the complex dependency of local sequencing coverage on the true underlying heterozygosity, which complicates the estimation of heterozygosity from sequence data. We show how we can use filters to correct for the confounding arising from sequencing depth. We find in practice that ratios of heterozygosity are more interpretable than absolute estimates and show that we obtain excellent conformity of ratios of heterozygosity with previous estimates from higher-coverage data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.