Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23934791›Full record

ArticleProteins2014

Protein models: the Grand Challenge of protein docking.

Ivan Anishchenko, Petras J Kundrotas, Alexander V Tuzikov, Ilya A Vakser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dockground: A comprehensive data resource for modeling of protein complexes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Challenges in structural approaches to cell modeling.Journal of molecular biology · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivan AnishchenkoCenter for Bioinformatics, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047; United Institute of Informatics Problems, National Academy of Sciences, 220012, Minsk, Belarus.
Petras J Kundrotas
Alexander V Tuzikov
Ilya A Vakser
United Institute of Informatics Problems · BYUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

Integrated Resource for Protein Recognition StudiesR01GM074255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI VAKSER, ILYA · 2005 to 2024
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074255NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM074255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterization of life processes at the molecular level requires structural details of protein-protein interactions (PPIs). The number of experimentally determined protein structures accounts only for a fraction of known proteins. This gap has to be bridged by modeling, typically using experimentally determined structures as templates to model related proteins. The fraction of experimentally determined PPI structures is even smaller than that for the individual proteins, due to a larger number of interactions than the number of individual proteins, and a greater difficulty of crystallizing protein-protein complexes. The approaches to structural modeling of PPI (docking) often have to rely on modeled structures of the interactors, especially in the case of large PPI networks. Structures of modeled proteins are typically less accurate than the ones determined by X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance. Thus the utility of approaches to dock these structures should be assessed by thorough benchmarking, specifically designed for protein models. To be credible, such benchmarking has to be based on carefully curated sets of structures with levels of distortion typical for modeled proteins. This article presents such a suite of models built for the benchmark set of the X-ray structures from the Dockground resource (http://dockground.bioinformatics.ku.edu) by a combination of homology modeling and Nudged Elastic Band method. For each monomer, six models were generated with predefined C(α) root mean square deviation from the native structure (1, 2, …, 6 Å). The sets and the accompanying data provide a comprehensive resource for the development of docking methodology for modeled proteins.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBinding SitesMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Sequence DataProtein Interaction MappingProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryReference StandardsSoftwareProteinsbenchmark setsprotein interactionsprotein modelingprotein recognitionstructure prediction

Identifiers

PMID23934791
PMCPMC4962618
OpenAlexW2119206069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.