Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23933975›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2013

Globalization and cognitive enhancement: emerging social and ethical challenges for ADHD clinicians.

Ilina Singh, Angela M Filipe, Imre Bard, Meredith Bergey, Lauren Baker

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilina SinghDepartment of Social Science, Health & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. ilina.singh@kcl.ac.uk
Angela M Filipe
Imre Bard
Meredith Bergey
Lauren Baker
King's College London · GBBrandeis University · USLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globalization of ADHD and the rise of cognitive enhancement have raised fresh concerns about the validity of ADHD diagnosis and the ethics of stimulant drug treatment. We review the literature on these two emerging phenomena, with a focus on the corresponding social, scientific and ethical debates over the universality of ADHD and the use of stimulant drug treatments in a global population of children and adolescents. Drawing on this literature, we reflect on the importance of ethically informed, ecologically sensitive clinical practices in relation to ADHD diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityEthics, MedicalBioethical IssuesCentral Nervous System StimulantsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInternationalityCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID23933975
OpenAlexW1978970424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.