Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23933466›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2013

Determinants of novel object and location recognition during development.

S A Jablonski, W B Schreiber, S R Westbrook, L E Brennan, M E Stanton

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developmental trajectory of episodic-like memory in rats.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S A JablonskiPsychology Department, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. Electronic address: sjablonski@psych.udel.edu.
W B Schreiber
S R Westbrook
L E Brennan
M E Stanton

Funding

Mechanisms of Trace Fear Conditioning in the Developing RatR21HD070662 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI HUNT, PAMELA S, ROSEN, JEFFREY B · 2011 to 2012
$414k
Mechanisms of configural learning in a rat model of FASDF31AA021317 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI SCHANDLE, SARAH JABLONSKI · 2012 to 2013
$48k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA021317NICHD NIH HHS 1-R21-HD070662-01NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD070662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the novel object recognition (OR) paradigm, rats are placed in an arena where they encounter two sample objects during a familiarization phase. A few minutes later, they are returned to the same arena and are presented with a familiar object and a novel object. The object location recognition (OL) variant involves the same familiarization procedure but during testing one of the familiar objects is placed in a novel location. Normal adult rats are able to perform both the OR and OL tasks, as indicated by enhanced exploration of the novel vs. the familiar test item. Rats with hippocampal lesions perform the OR but not OL task indicating a role of spatial memory in OL. Recently, these tasks have been used to study the ontogeny of spatial memory but the literature has yielded conflicting results. The current experiments add to this literature by: (1) behaviorally characterizing these paradigms in postnatal day (PD) 21, 26 and 31-day-old rats; (2) examining the role of NMDA systems in OR vs. OL; and (3) investigating the effects of neonatal alcohol exposure on both tasks. Results indicate that normal-developing rats are able to perform OR and OL by PD21, with greater novelty exploration in the OR task at each age. Second, memory acquisition in the OL but not OR task requires NMDA receptor function in juvenile rats [corrected]. Lastly, neonatal alcohol exposure does not disrupt performance in either task. Implications for the ontogeny of incidental spatial learning and its disruption by developmental alcohol exposure are discussed.

Indexed as

AgingAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolExploratory BehaviorFemaleMaleNeuropsychological TestsRats, Long-EvansReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRecognition, PsychologySpace PerceptionCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateBACblood alcohol concentrationcontext preexposure facilitation effectCPFEFASDsFetal alcohol spectrum disorderfetal alcohol spectrum disordersGDgestational dayHippocampusNMDArNMDA-receptorNMDA Receptorobject-in-place taskobject location taskobject recognition taskOiPOLOntogenyORPDpostnatal daysham intubatedSISpatial cognition

Identifiers

PMID23933466
PMCPMC3835172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.