Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23933428›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2014

Detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) at four U.S. wastewater treatment plants that provide effluent for reuse.

Rachel E Rosenberg Goldstein, Shirley A Micallef, Shawn G Gibbs, Ashish George, Emma Claye, Amir Sapkota, Sam W Joseph, Amy R Sapkota

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TracingMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  4. Enterococci,Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Towards the standardization ofWater research X · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Persistence of Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel E Rosenberg GoldsteinMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA.
Shirley A Micallef
Shawn G Gibbs
Ashish George
Emma Claye
Amir Sapkota
Sam W Joseph
Amy R Sapkota
University of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Irrigation workers' exposures to antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antimicrobialsR03OH009598 · OH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SAPKOTA, AMY REBECCA · 2009 to 2010
$154k
NIOSH CDC HHS 1-R03-OH009598-01NIOSH CDC HHS R03 OH009598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections, can occur in wastewater. However, to date, no previous studies have evaluated the occurrence of VRE at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) that send their treated effluent to reuse sites. We evaluated the occurrence, concentration, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of VRE at U.S. WWTPs associated with reuse sites. We collected 44 wastewater samples, representing treatment steps from influent to effluent, from two Mid-Atlantic and two Midwest WWTPs between October 2009 and October 2010. Samples were analyzed for total enterococci and VRE using membrane filtration. Isolates were confirmed using biochemical tests and PCR. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Sensititre microbroth dilution. Data were analyzed by two-sample proportion tests and analysis of variance. We detected VRE in 27% (12/44) of all wastewater samples collected and VRE represented 3% of total enterococci detected at all WWTPs. More samples were VRE-positive from the Mid-Atlantic compared to the Midwest WWTPs (p=0.008). VRE concentrations decreased as treatment progressed at all WWTPs, except at Mid-Atlantic WWTP1 where there was an increase in VRE concentrations in activated sludge reactor samples. VRE were not detected in chlorinated effluent, but were detected in one un-chlorinated effluent sample. All unique VRE isolates were multidrug resistant. Fifty-five percent (12/22) of the isolates displayed high-level aminoglycoside resistance. Our findings show that chlorination reduces the occurrence of VRE in wastewater. However, WWTP workers could be exposed to VRE during wastewater treatment. Our data also raise potential concerns about VRE exposure among individuals who come into contact with un-chlorinated reclaimed water.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial Typing TechniquesEnterococcusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMid-Atlantic RegionMidwestern United StatesPolymerase Chain ReactionVancomycinVancomycin ResistanceWastewaterAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsVancomycinWastewaterAntibiotic-resistant bacteriaEnterococciReclaimed watervancomycin-intermediate enterococcivancomycin-resistant enterococciVancomycin-resistant enterococcivancomycin-resistant S. aureusVIEVREVRSAWastewaterwastewater treatment plantWastewater treatment plantsWWTP

Identifiers

PMID23933428
PMCPMC8259341
OpenAlexW2029438313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.