Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23933308›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2014

DNA methylation and childhood maltreatment: from animal models to human studies.

P-E Lutz, G Turecki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Suicide: Genetics and Heritability.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Epigenetics and Depression: An Update.Psychiatry investigation · 2019
    Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P-E LutzMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
G TureckiMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: gustavo.turecki@mcgill.ca.

Funding

CIHR 119429-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood maltreatment (CM) has estimated prevalence among Western societies between 10% and 15%. As CM associates with increased risk of several psychiatric disorders, early age of illness onset, increased comorbidity and negative clinical outcome, it imposes a major public health, social and economic impact. Although the clinical consequences of CM are well characterized, a major challenge remains to understand how negative early-life events can affect brain function over extended periods of time. We review here both animal and human studies indicating that the epigenetic mechanism of DNA methylation is a crucial mediator of early-life experiences, thereby maintaining life-long neurobiological sequelae of CM, and strongly determining psychopathological risk.

Indexed as

Child AbuseDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticAge of OnsetAnimalsBrainChildFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiceModels, AnimalRatsStress, Psychologicalchildhood maltreatmentDNA methylationepigeneticglucocorticoid receptormaternal carestress

Identifiers

PMID23933308
PMCPMC5293537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.