Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23932825›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of infection control2013

Evaluation of respiratory protection programs and practices in California hospitals during the 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza pandemic.

Stella Beckman, Barbara Materna, Suzi Goldmacher, Jennifer Zipprich, Maryann D'Alessandro, Debra Novak, Robert Harrison

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of infection control, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electron beam technology for Re-processing of personal protective equipment.Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Respiratory Protection Perceptions among Malian Health Workers: Insights from the Health Belief Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Should We or Should We Not Reuse Filtering Face Piece Masks? A Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stella BeckmanEpidemiology Fellowship Program, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Atlanta, GA; California Department of Public Health, Occupational Health Branch, Richmond, CA.
Barbara Materna
Suzi Goldmacher
Jennifer Zipprich
Maryann D'Alessandro
Debra Novak
Robert Harrison
California Department of Public Health · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USCouncil of State and Territorial Epidemiologists · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USPublic Health Institute · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999PHS HHS 254-2009-31321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergence of the novel 2009 influenza A H1N1 virus in California led to an evaluation of hospital respiratory protection programs (RPPs) and practices by the California Department of Public Health during the 2009-2010 influenza season.

methodsOnsite evaluation of 16 hospitals consisted of interviews with managers and health care workers about RPPs and practices, review of written RPPs, and limited observations of personnel using respirators. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsAll hospitals had implemented policies requiring the minimum use of N95 filtering facepiece respirators when working with patients with H1N1 virus infection; 95.5% of health care workers (n = 199) reported they would wear at least this level of protection when in close contact with a patient with confirmed or suspected H1N1 virus infection. However, evaluation of written RPPs indicated deficiencies in required areas, most commonly in recordkeeping, designation of a program administrator, program evaluation, employee training, and fit testing procedures.

conclusionsHealth care workers were aware of respiratory protection required when providing care for patients with confirmed or suspected H1N1 virus infection. Hospitals should improve written RPPs, fully implement written procedures, and conduct periodic program evaluation to ensure effectiveness of respirator use for health care worker protection. Increased accessibility of resources tailored for hospital respirator program administrators may be helpful.

Indexed as

CaliforniaCross InfectionHospitalsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanPandemicsRespiratory Protective DevicesAerosol transmissible diseaseHealth careHospitalN95 respiratorPreparedness

Identifiers

PMID23932825
PMCPMC4615716
OpenAlexW2059917778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.