Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23932504›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2013

Tuning mechanical performance of poly(ethylene glycol) and agarose interpenetrating network hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering.

Deena A Rennerfeldt, Amanda N Renth, Zsolt Talata, Stevin H Gehrke, Michael S Detamore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Single-Cell Microgels for Diagnostics and Therapeutics.Advanced functional materials · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deena A RennerfeldtDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Amanda N Renth
Zsolt Talata
Stevin H Gehrke
Michael S Detamore

Funding

MBRS IMSD PROGRAM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSASR25GM062232 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI CARTWRIGHT, PAULYN, HANSON, PAUL R. · 2001 to 2018
$6.9M
Gradient-based strategy for osteochondral regenerationR01AR056347 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DETAMORE, MICHAEL S. · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
High toughness bio-inspired hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineeringR21EB008783 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DETAMORE, MICHAEL S. · 2009 to 2010
$394k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056347NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB008783NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM062232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogels are attractive for tissue engineering applications due to their incredible versatility, but they can be limited in cartilage tissue engineering applications due to inadequate mechanical performance. In an effort to address this limitation, our team previously reported the drastic improvement in the mechanical performance of interpenetrating networks (IPNs) of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEG-DA) and agarose relative to pure PEG-DA and agarose networks. The goal of the current study was specifically to determine the relative importance of PEG-DA concentration, agarose concentration, and PEG-DA molecular weight in controlling mechanical performance, swelling characteristics, and network parameters. IPNs consistently had compressive and shear moduli greater than the additive sum of either single network when compared to pure PEG-DA gels with a similar PEG-DA content. IPNs withstood a maximum stress of up to 4.0 MPa in unconfined compression, with increased PEG-DA molecular weight being the greatest contributing factor to improved failure properties. However, aside from failure properties, PEG-DA concentration was the most influential factor for the large majority of properties. Increasing the agarose and PEG-DA concentrations as well as the PEG-DA molecular weight of agarose/PEG-DA IPNs and pure PEG-DA gels improved moduli and maximum stresses by as much as an order of magnitude or greater compared to pure PEG-DA gels in our previous studies. Although the viability of encapsulated chondrocytes was not significantly affected by IPN formulation, glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content was significantly influenced, with a 12-fold increase over a three-week period in gels with a lower PEG-DA concentration. These results suggest that mechanical performance of IPNs may be tuned with partial but not complete independence from biological performance of encapsulated cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCell SurvivalChondrocytesFemaleGlycosaminoglycansHydrogelsPolyethylene GlycolsSepharoseSwineTissue EngineeringGlycosaminoglycansHydrogelsPolyethylene GlycolsSepharoseAgaroseCartilageHydrogelsInterpenetrating networksMechanical performancePEG-DA

Identifiers

PMID23932504
PMCPMC3773240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.