Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23931302›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2013

Force to divide: structural and mechanical requirements for actomyosin ring contraction.

Inês Mendes Pinto, Boris Rubinstein, Rong Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Ordering of myosin II filaments driven by mechanical forces: experiments and theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cytokinesis in Metazoa and Fungi.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inês Mendes PintoStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, USA. ipi@stowers.org
Boris Rubinstein
Rong Li
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

The Mechanism and Regulation of Cytokinesis in YeastR01GM059964 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI LI, RONG · 1999 to 2015
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059964NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM059964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the unresolved questions in the field of cell division is how the actomyosin cytoskeleton remains structurally organized while generating the contractile force to divide one cell into two. In analogy to the actomyosin-based force production mechanism in striated muscle, it was originally proposed that contractile stress in the actomyosin ring is generated via a sliding filament mechanism within an organized sarcomere-like array. However, over the last 30 years, ultrastructural and functional studies have noted important distinctions between cytokinetic structures in dividing cells and muscle sarcomeres. Myosin-II motor activity is not always required, and there is evidence that actin depolymerization contributes to contraction. In this Review, the architecture and contractile dynamics of the actomyosin ring at the cell division plane will be discussed. We will report the interdisciplinary advances in the field as well as their integration into a mechanistic understanding of contraction in cell division and in other biological processes that rely on an actomyosin-based force-generating system.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionActomyosinAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCytoskeletonHumansMotionActomyosin

Identifiers

PMID23931302
PMCPMC3736747
OpenAlexW2117925020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.