Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23930983›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2013

AMIGAS: building a cervical cancer screening intervention for public health practice.

Judith Lee Smith, Katherine M Wilson, Carlyn E Orians, Theresa L Byrd

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith Lee SmithEpidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. JLeeSmith@cdc.gov
Katherine M Wilson
Carlyn E Orians
Theresa L Byrd
Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research CentersU48DP000057 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TORTOLERO, SUSAN · 2004 to 2009
$17.0M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP000057NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48-DP000057PHS HHS 200-2002-00573PHS HHS 200-2008-27956PHS HHS 200-98-0102PHS HHS S1166-19/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany barriers to cervical cancer screening for Hispanic women have been documented, but few effective interventions exist. The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends increasing cervical cancer screening through various methods. Building on this evidence, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded the research and testing phases for an evidence-based and theoretically grounded intervention designed to increase cervical cancer screening among never and rarely screened Hispanic women of Mexican descent. In this article, we describe the development process of the AMIGAS (Ayudando a las Mujeres con Información, Guía, y Amor para su Salud) intervention, highlight the integration of scientific evidence and community-based participatory research principles, and identify opportunities for dissemination, adaptation, and implementation of this intervention.

methodsThe AMIGAS team was a collaboration among researchers, promotoras (community health workers), and program administrators. The multiyear, multiphase project was conducted in Houston, Texas; El Paso, Texas; and Yakima, Washington. The team completed several rounds of formative research, designed intervention materials and methodology, conducted a randomized controlled trial, created a guide for program administrators, and developed an intervention dissemination plan.

resultsTrial results demonstrated that AMIGAS was successful in increasing cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women. Adaptation of AMIGAS showed minimal reduction of outcomes. Dissemination efforts are underway to make AMIGAS available in a downloadable format via the Internet.

conclusionsDeveloping a community-based intervention that is evidence-based and theoretically grounded is challenging, time-intensive, and requires collaboration among multiple disciplines. Inclusion of key stakeholders-in particular program deliverers and administrators-and planning for dissemination and translation to practice are integral components of successful intervention design. By providing explicit directions for adaptation for program deliverers, relevant information for program administrators, and access to the intervention via the Internet, AMIGAS is available to help increase cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women and other women disproportionately affected by cervical cancer.

Indexed as

AdultCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity Health WorkersEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMass ScreeningProgram DevelopmentPublic Health PracticeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTexasUnited StatesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID23930983
PMCPMC4603539
OpenAlexW1996078748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.