ArticleInfection ecology & epidemiology2013
Bioaerosol sampling for airborne bacteria in a small animal veterinary teaching hospital.
Article in Infection ecology & epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Airborne bacterial profiling and air disinfection efficacy in small animal hospitals in South Korea.Journal of veterinary science · 2026Article
- Prevalence, Distribution and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated From Environmental Samples in a Veterinary Clinical Hospital in Madrid, Spain.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- Environmental bacterial load during surgical and ultrasound procedures in a Swedish small animal hospital.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Factors Affecting Gut Microbiota of Puppies from Birth to Weaning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Assessment of fungal bioaerosols and particulate matter characteristics in indoor and outdoor air of veterinary clinics.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2021Article
- Does Bacteria Colonization of Canine Newborns Start in the Uterus?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Patterns of bacterial motility in microfluidics-confining environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- A Study on Concentration, Identification, and Reduction of Airborne Microorganisms in the Military Working Dog Clinic.Safety and health at work · 2020Article
- Detection of Common Respiratory Viruses and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Patient-Occupied Rooms in Pediatric Wards.Medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAirborne microorganisms within the hospital environment can potentially cause infection in susceptible patients. The objectives of this study were to identify, quantify, and determine the nosocomial potential of common airborne microorganisms present within a small animal teaching hospital.
methodsBioaerosol sampling was done initially in all 11 rooms and, subsequently, weekly samples were taken from selected rooms over a 9-week period. Samples were collected twice (morning and afternoon) at each site on each sampling day. The rooms were divided into two groups: Group 1, in which morning sampling was post-cleaning and afternoon sampling was during activity, and Group 2, in which morning sampling was pre-cleaning and afternoon sampling was post-cleaning. The total aerobic bacterial plate counts per m(3) and bacterial identification were done using standard microbiological methods.
resultsA total of 14 bacterial genera were isolated with the most frequent being Micrococcus spp. followed by species of Corynebacterium, Bacillus, and Staphylococcus. There was a significant interaction between location and time for rooms in Group 1 (p=0.0028) but not in Group 2 (p>0.05). Microbial counts for rooms in Group 2 were significantly greater in the mornings than in the afternoon (p=0.0049). The microbial counts were also significantly different between some rooms (p=0.0333).
conclusionThe detection of significantly higher airborne microbial loads in different rooms at different times of the day suggests that the probability of acquiring nosocomial infections is higher at these times and locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.