Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23930037›Full record

ArticleJournal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine2013

Reliability studies of diagnostic methods in Indian traditional Ayurveda medicine: An overview.

Vrinda Hitendra Kurande, Rasmus Waagepetersen, Egon Toft, Ramjee Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prakriti-based research: Good reporting practices.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine · 2016
    Article
  7. Interrater reliability of diagnostic methods in traditional Indian ayurvedic medicine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Weighted mean: A possible method to express overall Dhatu Sarata.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vrinda Hitendra KurandeClinical Science, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Rasmus Waagepetersen
Egon Toft
Ramjee Prasad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, a need to develop supportive new scientific evidence for contemporary Ayurveda has emerged. One of the research objectives is an assessment of the reliability of diagnoses and treatment. Reliability is a quantitative measure of consistency. It is a crucial issue in classification (such as prakriti classification), method development (pulse diagnosis), quality assurance for diagnosis and treatment and in the conduct of clinical studies. Several reliability studies are conducted in western medicine. The investigation of the reliability of traditional Chinese, Japanese and Sasang medicine diagnoses is in the formative stage. However, reliability studies in Ayurveda are in the preliminary stage. In this paper, examples are provided to illustrate relevant concepts of reliability studies of diagnostic methods and their implication in practice, education, and training. An introduction to reliability estimates and different study designs and statistical analysis is given for future studies in Ayurveda.

Indexed as

Ayurvedadiagnostic methodskappa statisticsreliabilitytraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID23930037
PMCPMC3737449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.