Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23929738›Full record

ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2013

Common chromosome fragile sites in human and murine epithelial cells and FHIT/FRA3B loss-induced global genome instability.

Seyed Ali Hosseini, Susan Horton, Joshua C Saldivar, Satoshi Miuma, Martha R Stampfer, Nyla A Heerema, Kay Huebner

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. DNA replication stress: oncogenes in the spotlight.Genetics and molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seyed Ali HosseiniDepartment of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Susan Horton
Joshua C Saldivar
Satoshi Miuma
Martha R Stampfer
Nyla A Heerema
Kay Huebner
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Integrative Training in Biomedical SystemsT32GM068412 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PARVIN, JEFFREY D · 2005 to 2020
$2.4M
MicroRNA profiles of TN breast cancer to define subgroups and targets for therapyU01CA154200 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUEBNER, KAY · 2010 to 2014
$2.3M
Wwox as a Critical Signal Mediator in Breast CancerR01CA120516 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUEBNER, KAY · 2006 to 2013
$1.3M
Fhit modulation of cell cycle progression and DNA damage responseR01CA132453 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HUEBNER, KAY · 2007 to 2010
$1.3M
Fhit as modulator of Chk1 termination and response to DNA-damaging agentsF31CA157150 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SALDIVAR, JOSHUA · 2010 to 2012
$79k
NCI NIH HHS CA120516NCI NIH HHS CA132453NCI NIH HHS CA154200NCI NIH HHS F31 CA157150NCI NIH HHS F31CA157150NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120516NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132453NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154200NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM068412NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM068412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal positions of common fragile sites differ in lymphoblasts and fibroblasts, with positions dependent on the epigenetically determined density of replication origins at these loci. Because rearrangement of fragile loci and associated loss of fragile gene products are hallmarks of cancers, we aimed to map common fragile sites in epithelial cells, from which most cancers derive. Among the five most frequently activated sites in human epithelial cells were chromosome bands 2q33 and Xq22.1, which are not among top fragile sites identified in lymphoblasts or fibroblasts. FRA16D at 16q23 was among the top three fragile sites in the human epithelial cells examined, as it is in lymphoblasts and fibroblasts, while FRA3B at 3p14.2, the top fragile locus in lymphoblasts, was not fragile in most epithelial cell lines tested. Epithelial cells exhibited varying hierarchies of fragile sites; some frequent epithelial cell fragile sites are apparently not frequently altered in epithelial cancers and sites that are frequently deleted in epithelial cancers are not necessarily among the most fragile. Since we have reported that loss of expression of the FRA3B-encoded FHIT protein causes increased replication stress-induced DNA damage, we also examined the effect of FHIT-deficiency on markers of genome instability in epithelial cells. FHIT-deficient cells exhibited increases in fragile breaks and in γH2AX and 53BP1 foci in G1 phase cells, confirming in epithelial cells that the FHIT gene and encompassing FRA3B, is a "caretaker gene" necessary for maintenance of genome stability.

Indexed as

Genomic InstabilityAcid Anhydride HydrolasesAnimalsBis(5'-adenosyl)triphosphataseCell LineChromosome Fragile SitesChromosomes, Human, Pair 2Cytogenetic AnalysisEpithelial CellsG1 PhaseGenetic MarkersHumansMiceNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsReplication OriginAcid Anhydride HydrolasesBis(5'-adenosyl)triphosphataseGenetic MarkersNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23929738
PMCPMC4293015
OpenAlexW1529287511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.