ArticleGut2013
Comparison of MRI with liver-specific contrast agents and multidetector row CT for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 15 direct comparative studies.
Article in Gut, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2016Pooled it
- MRI features of histologic subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histologic, genetic, and molecular biologic classification.European radiology · 2022Review
- Advanced CT techniques for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma.La Radiologia medica · 2021Review
- A Concise Review on Current Trends in Imaging and Surgical Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cureus · 2020Review
- Updates on Imaging of Liver Tumors.Current oncology reports · 2020Review
- Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Hepatocellular carcinoma and mimickers.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2019Review
- LI-RADS 2017: An update.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018Review
- Health economic assessment of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI versus ECCM-MRI and multi-detector CT for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in China.PloS one · 2018Article
- Imaging of HCC-Current State of the Art.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Hepatocellular carcinoma: From clinical practice to evidence-based treatment protocols.World journal of hepatology · 2015Review
- Hepatocellular carcinoma: Advances in diagnosis, management, and long term outcome.World journal of hepatology · 2015Review
- Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: 2016 Consensus Recommendations of the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.Korean journal of radiologyReview
- Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver: diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and evaluation of response to treatment - Part 2.Radiologia brasileiraReview
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.