Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2013
Differences in clinical outcomes in keratitis due to fungus and bacteria.
Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fusarium Keratitis: A Systematic Review (1969 to 2023).Mycopathologia · 2024Pooled it
- Medical interventions for fungal keratitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Visual Impairment in Fungal Versus Bacterial Corneal Ulcers 4 Years After Successful Antimicrobial Treatment.American journal of ophthalmology · 2019Trial
- Evaluation of corneal cross-linking as adjuvant therapy for the management of fungal keratitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Multidrug antifungal resistance and clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis: a prospective study in a South Indian population.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Recovery and regeneration: exploring positive sequelae of keratitis.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Pathology-inspired collagen-binding thermosensitive micelle drops enable prolonged and efficient treatment of fungal keratitis.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Comparison of Recurrent and Naïve Keratitis in a Cohort of 1303 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Phaeoacremonium iranianum - a new corneal pathogen.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Rapid Point-of-Care Identification of Aspergillus Species in Microbial Keratitis.JAMA ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Oral voriconazole monotherapy for fungal keratitis: efficacy, safety, and factors associated with outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- The Case for Fungal Keratitis to Be Accepted as a Neglected Tropical Disease.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Comparative study on costs incurred for treatment of patients with bacterial and fungal keratitis - A retrospective analysis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Microbial Profile and Clinical Outcomes of Fungal Keratitis at a Single-Center Tertiary Care Hospital.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Profiling of the Conjunctival Bacterial Microbiota Reveals the Feasibility of Utilizing a Microbiome-Based Machine Learning Model to Differentially Diagnose Microbial Keratitis and the Core Components of the Conjunctival Bacterial Interaction Network.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Thermosensitive Tri-Block Polymer Nanoparticle-Hydrogel Composites as Payloads of Natamycin for Antifungal Therapy AgainstInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2022Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Fungal Keratitis in the United Kingdom 2011-2020: A 10-Year Study.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Update on the management of fungal keratitis.International ophthalmology · 2021Review
- First report of a new corneal pathogen: Phaeoacremonium parasiticum.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.