Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23929431›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Sequential (18)F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of complete pathological response in breast and axilla during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Bas B Koolen, Kenneth E Pengel, Jelle Wesseling, Wouter V Vogel, Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters, Andrew D Vincent, Kenneth G A Gilhuijs, Sjoerd Rodenhuis, Emiel J Th Rutgers, Renato A Valdés Olmos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The accuracy ofEuropean radiology · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [La Radiologia medica · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Subtype-GuidedThe oncologist · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Additional value ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bas B KoolenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kenneth E Pengel
Jelle Wesseling
Wouter V Vogel
Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
Andrew D Vincent
Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Sjoerd Rodenhuis
Emiel J Th Rutgers
Renato A Valdés Olmos
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the value of response monitoring in both the primary tumour and axillary nodes on sequential PET/CT scans during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for predicting complete pathological response (pCR), taking the breast cancer subtype into account.

methodsIn 107 consecutive patients 290 PET/CT scans were performed at baseline (PET/CT1, 107 patients), after 2 - 3 weeks of chemotherapy (PET/CT2, 85 patients), and after 6 - 8 weeks (PET/CT3, 98 patients). The relative changes in SUVmax (from baseline) of the tumour and the lymph nodes and in both combined (after logistic regression), and the changes in the highest SUVmax between scans (either tumour or lymph node) were determined and their associations with pCR of the tumour and lymph nodes after completion of NAC were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsA pCR was seen in 17 HER2-positive tumours (65 %), 1 ER-positive/HER2-negative tumour (2 %), and 16 triple-negative tumours (52 %). The areas under the ROC curves (ROC-AUC) for the prediction of pCR in HER2-positive tumours after 3 weeks were 0.61 for the relative change in tumours, 0.67 for the combined change in tumour and nodes, and 0.72 for the changes in the highest SUVmax between scans. After 8 weeks equivalent values were 0.59, 0.42 and 0.64, respectively. In triple-negative tumours the ROC-AUCs were 0.76, 0.84 and 0.76 after 2 weeks, and 0.87, 0.93 and 0.88 after 6 weeks, respectively.

conclusionIn triple-negative tumours a PET/CT scan after 6 weeks (three cycles) appears to be optimally predictive of pCR. In HER2-positive tumours neither a PET/CT scan after 3 weeks nor after 8 weeks seems to be useful. The changes in SUVmax of both the tumour and axillary nodes combined correlates best with pCR.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Neoadjuvant TherapyPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLymph NodesMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingReceptors, EstrogenRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Receptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID23929431
OpenAlexW2093651547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.