Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23929366›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular drugs and therapy2013

Renal effects of levosimendan: a consensus report.

Mehmet B Yilmaz, Elena Grossini, José C Silva Cardoso, István Édes, Francesco Fedele, Piero Pollesello, Matti Kivikko, Veli-Pekka Harjola, Julia Hasslacher, Alexandre Mebazaa and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bibliometric analysis of levosimendan.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.

Mehmet B YilmazDepartment of Cardiology, Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey, cardioceptor@gmail.com.
Elena Grossini
José C Silva Cardoso
István Édes
Francesco Fedele
Piero Pollesello
Matti Kivikko
Veli-Pekka Harjola
Julia Hasslacher
Alexandre Mebazaa
Andrea Morelli
Jos le Noble
Anders Oldner
Ignacio Oulego Erroz
John T Parissis
Alexander Parkhomenko
Gerhard Poelzl
Sebastian Rehberg
Sven-Erik Ricksten
Luís M Rodríguez Fernández
Markku Salmenperä
Mervyn Singer
Sascha Treskatsch
Bojan Vrtovec
Gerhard Wikström
Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia · ESOrion Corporation (United Kingdom) · GBSapienza University of Rome · ITCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHelsinki University Hospital · FIInnsbruck Medical University · ATInserm · FRKarolinska Institutet · SEMedical University of Vienna · ATNational Scientific Center "M.D. Strazhesko Institute of Cardiology" · UASahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUCL Australia · AUUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GRUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity of Debrecen · HUUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Münster · DEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal dysfunction is common in clinical settings in which cardiac function is compromised such as heart failure, cardiac surgery or sepsis, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer and potassium channel opener used in the treatment of acute heart failure. This review describes the effects of the inodilator levosimendan on renal function. A panel of 25 scientists and clinicians from 15 European countries (Austria, Finland, France, Hungary, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and Ukraine) convened and reached a consensus on the current interpretation of the renal effects of levosimendan described both in non-clinical research and in clinical study reports. Most reports on the effect of levosimendan indicate an improvement of renal function in heart failure, sepsis and cardiac surgery settings. However, caution should be applied as study designs differed from randomized, controlled studies to uncontrolled ones. Importantly, in the largest HF study (REVIVE I and II) no significant changes in the renal function were detected. As it regards the mechanism of action, the opening of mitochondrial KATP channels by levosimendan is involved through a preconditioning effect. There is a strong rationale for randomized controlled trials seeking beneficial renal effects of levosimendan. As an example, a study is shortly to commence to assess the role of levosimendan for the prevention of acute organ dysfunction in sepsis (LeoPARDS).

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiotonic AgentsHumansHydrazonesKidneyPyridazinesSimendanCardiotonic AgentsHydrazonesPyridazinesSimendan

Identifiers

PMID23929366
PMCPMC3830192
OpenAlexW1987952896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.