ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2013
Transfection in the third dimension.
Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Matrices Activated with Messenger RNA.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Matrix stiffness regulates lipid nanoparticle-mRNA delivery in cell-laden hydrogels.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2022Article
- Extracellular matrix mechanics regulate transfection and SOX9-directed differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.Acta biomaterialia · 2020Article
- Pathways Governing Polyethylenimine Polyplex Transfection in Microporous Annealed Particle Scaffolds.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2019Article
- Biomaterial substrate modifications that influence cell-material interactions to prime cellular responses to nonviral gene delivery.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019Review
- Nucleic acid delivery to mesenchymal stem cells: a review of nonviral methods and applications.Journal of biological engineering · 2019Review
- Messenger RNA Delivery for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2019Review
- It's All in the Delivery: Designing Hydrogels for Cell and Non-viral Gene Therapies.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2018Review
- Functionalization of microparticles with mineral coatings enhances non-viral transfection of primary human cells.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Efficient delivery of C/EBP beta gene into human mesenchymal stem cells via polyethylenimine-coated gold nanoparticles enhances adipogenic differentiation.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Cell-Based Assay Design for High-Content Screening of Drug Candidates.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An understanding of parameters that modulate gene transfer in 3-D will assist in the formation of gene delivery systems and scaffolds, which can mediate efficient non-viral delivery for guiding in vivo tissue regeneration and therapy. We have previously demonstrated the cell area and length, integrin expression, and RhoGTPase mediated signalling to be pivotal parameters that guide gene transfer to mouse mesenchymal stem cells (mMSCs) cultured in 2-D and are modulated by ECM proteins. In this study, we were interested in determining if cationic polymer mediated gene transfer to cells seeded in 3-D would occur through different mechanisms as compared to those seeded in 2-D. In particular, we examined the endocytosis pathways used to internalize polyplexes, and the role of cytoskeletal dynamics and RhoGTPases in non-viral gene transfer for cells seeded in 2-D and 3-D. Inhibition of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis resulted in a more drastic decrease in overall transgene expression for cells seeded in 3-D than for those in 2-D. In addition, polyplex internalization was only significantly decreased in 3-D when clathrin-mediated endocytosis was inhibited, while caveolae-mediated endocytosis inhibition for cells seeded in 2-D resulted in the strongest polyplex internalization inhibition. Actin and microtubule polymerization affected 2-D and 3-D transfection differently. Microtubule depolymerization enhanced transgene expression in 2-D, but inhibited transgene expression in 3-D. Lastly, inhibition of RhoGTPases also affected 2-D and 3-D transfection differently. The inhibition of ROCK effectors resulted in a decrease of transgene expression and internalization for cells seeded in 3-D, but not in 2-D, and the inhibition of the effector PAK1 resulted in an increase of transgene expression for both 2-D and 3-D. Overall, our study suggests that the process of gene transfer occurs through different mechanisms for cells seeded in 2-D compared to those seeded in 3-D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.