Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23929004›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2014

Development of the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire--physical Function (OPAQ-PF): an osteoporosis-targeted, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure of physical function.

A N Naegeli, A Nixon, R Burge, D T Gold, S Silverman

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The importance of physical function to people with osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire-Physical Function (OPAQ-PF): a psychometrically validated osteoporosis-targeted patient reported outcome measure of daily activities of physical function.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A N NaegeliEli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA, naegeli_april_n@lilly.com.
A Nixon
R Burge
D T Gold
S Silverman
Eli Lilly (United States) · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDuke University · USHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe have developed a short, patient-reported outcome questionnaire--the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire--Physical Function (OPAQ-PF)--that assesses the impact of osteoporosis on physical function. OPAQ-PF contains 15 items in three domains (mobility, physical positions, and transfers) and has content validity in osteoporosis patients with and without a history of fracture.

introductionThis paper describes the development of the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire--Physical Function (OPAQ-PF), a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire based on OPAQ v.2.0 (60 items, 14 domains) that assesses the impact of osteoporosis on physical function.

methodsOPAQ v.2.0 was administered to patients with osteoporosis. Item response theory methodology and clinical judgment were used to retain/eliminate items. The resulting instrument was modified during two sets of concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews with osteoporosis patients.

resultsItem response theory-based analysis of OPAQ v.2.0 (n = 1,478) coupled with clinician input resulted in the generation of a 21-item, six-domain instrument with a frequency response format. Interview data from 32 participants were used to modify this version and led to generation of the final instrument, OPAQ-PF. This final version has a severity response format and contains 15 items in three domains (mobility, physical positions, and transfers) that group together to provide an overall assessment of physical function in patients with osteoporosis. Twenty-two of the 32 interview participants (69 %) had previously sustained a fracture. Symptoms occurred primarily in these patients.

conclusionsOPAQ-PF represents a brief, focused, PRO instrument that assesses physical function in patients with osteoporosis, specifically related to mobility, physical positions, and transfers. This questionnaire has content validity in osteoporosis patients who have, and have not, sustained a prior fracture.

Indexed as

Patient Outcome AssessmentActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23929004
PMCPMC3906552
OpenAlexW2143702189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.