ArticleMedical physics2013
Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems.
Article in Medical physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning on diagnosis and classification of hip fracture: systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Clinical Decision Support Systems for Prehospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Identification.Critical pathways in cardiology · 2020Pooled it
- An emotional modulation model as signature for the identification of children developmental disorders.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- PatchCLIP enables region specific contrastive health record and image joint training with patch embedding loss.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-based artificial intelligence for breast lesion classification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Effect of artificial intelligence-aided differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management.European radiology · 2025Article
- YOLO-Tryppa: A Novel YOLO-Based Approach for Rapid and Accurate Detection of Small Trypanosoma Parasites.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Taxonomy of Acute Stroke: Imaging, Processing, and Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Incidence and imaging characteristics of difficult to detect retrospectively identified brain metastases in patients receiving repeat courses of stereotactic radiosurgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Mapping the Bibliometrics Landscape of AI in Medicine: Methodological Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based algorithm for postoperative glioblastoma MRI segmentation: a promising new tool for tumor burden assessment.Brain informatics · 2023Article
- Regulatory considerations for medical imaging AI/ML devices in the United States: concepts and challenges.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Deep Learning and Medical Imaging for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: MRI, CT, and PET Scans.Cancers · 2023Review
- An Optimized Deep Learning Model for Predicting Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Structural MRI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Characterization of Ischemic Stroke with MRI Images: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Assessing Detection Accuracy of Computerized Sonographic Features and Computer-Assisted Reading Performance in Differentiating Thyroid Cancers.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- GAN augmentation for multiclass image classification using hemorrhage detection as a case-study.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) systems are increasingly being used as an aid by clinicians for detection and interpretation of diseases. Computer-aided detection systems mark regions of an image that may reveal specific abnormalities and are used to alert clinicians to these regions during image interpretation. Computer-aided diagnosis systems provide an assessment of a disease using image-based information alone or in combination with other relevant diagnostic data and are used by clinicians as a decision support in developing their diagnoses. While CAD systems are commercially available, standardized approaches for evaluating and reporting their performance have not yet been fully formalized in the literature or in a standardization effort. This deficiency has led to difficulty in the comparison of CAD devices and in understanding how the reported performance might translate into clinical practice. To address these important issues, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed the Computer Aided Detection in Diagnostic Imaging Subcommittee (CADSC), in part, to develop recommendations on approaches for assessing CAD system performance. The purpose of this paper is to convey the opinions of the AAPM CADSC members and to stimulate the development of consensus approaches and "best practices" for evaluating CAD systems. Both the assessment of a standalone CAD system and the evaluation of the impact of CAD on end-users are discussed. It is hoped that awareness of these important evaluation elements and the CADSC recommendations will lead to further development of structured guidelines for CAD performance assessment. Proper assessment of CAD system performance is expected to increase the understanding of a CAD system's effectiveness and limitations, which is expected to stimulate further research and development efforts on CAD technologies, reduce problems due to improper use, and eventually improve the utility and efficacy of CAD in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.