Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23927194›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2013

Low-frequency (<100 kHz), low-intensity (<100 mW/cm(2)) ultrasound to treat venous ulcers: a human study and in vitro experiments.

Joshua A Samuels, Michael S Weingarten, David J Margolis, Leonid Zubkov, Youhan Sunny, Christopher R Bawiec, Dolores Conover, Peter A Lewin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Design of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Device to be Used in At-Home Setting-A Holistic Approach.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Development of Low Frequency (20-100 kHz) Clinically Viable Ultrasound Applicator for Chronic Wound Treatment.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua A SamuelsSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. jas527@drexel.edu
Michael S Weingarten
David J Margolis
Leonid Zubkov
Youhan Sunny
Christopher R Bawiec
Dolores Conover
Peter A Lewin
Drexel University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Acousto-optic Theragnostic Approach for Chronic Wound ManagementR01EB009670 · NIBIB · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIN, PETER A. · 2010 to 2013
$1.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS 5 R01 EB009670NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether low frequency (<100 kHz), low intensity (<100 mW/cm(2), spatial peak temporal peak) ultrasound can be an effective treatment of venous stasis ulcers, which affect 500 000 patients annually costing over $1 billion per year. Twenty subjects were treated with either 20 or 100 kHz ultrasound for between 15 and 45 min per session for a maximum of four treatments. Healing was monitored by changes in wound area. Additionally, two in vitro studies were conducted using fibroblasts exposed to 20 kHz ultrasound to confirm the ultrasound's effects on proliferation and cellular metabolism. Subjects receiving 20 kHz ultrasound for 15 min showed statistically faster (p < 0.03) rate of wound closure. All five of these subjects fully healed by the fourth treatment session. The in vitro results indicated that 20 kHz ultrasound at 100 mW/cm(2) caused an average of 32% increased metabolism (p < 0.05) and 40% increased cell proliferation (p < 0.01) after 24 h when compared to the control, non-treated cells. Although statistically limited, this work supports the notion that low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound is beneficial for treating venous ulcers.

Indexed as

3T3 CellsAnimalsCell ProliferationEnergy MetabolismEquipment DesignFibroblastsHumansMicePilot ProjectsTime FactorsTransducersTreatment OutcomeUltrasonic TherapyVaricose UlcerWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID23927194
PMCPMC3745491
OpenAlexW2027957821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.