Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23926422›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2013

Quetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Benchalak Maneeton, Narong Maneeton, Manit Srisurapanont, Kaweesak Chittawatanarat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00954603 (Compare Efficacy and Safety Between Quetiapine and Haloperidol in Treatment Delirium), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00954603 phase3terminatednot on this map

Compare Efficacy and Safety Between Quetiapine and Haloperidol in Treatment Delirium

TypeinterventionalSponsorChiang Mai UniversityRan2009 to 2012Enrolled52ConditionsDeliriumArmsquetiapine, haloperidol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antipsychotics for treatment of delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Efficacy and safety of guanfacine in hospitalized patients with delirium: A scoping review.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Brain Prehabilitation for Oncologic Surgery.Current oncology reports · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benchalak ManeetonDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Narong Maneeton
Manit Srisurapanont
Kaweesak Chittawatanarat
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtypical antipsychotic drugs may have low propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects in delirious patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability between quetiapine and haloperidol in controlling delirious behavior.

methodsA 7-day prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2009 to April 2011 in medically ill patients with delirium. Measures used for daily assessment included the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98 (DRS-R-98) and total sleep time. The Clinical Global Impression, Improvement (CGI-I) and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson- Angus Scale were applied daily. The primary outcome was the DRS-R-98 severity scores. The data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

resultsFifty-two subjects (35 males and 17 females) were randomized to receive 25-100 mg/day of quetiapine (n = 24) or 0.5-2.0 mg/day of haloperidol (n = 28). Mean (standard deviation) doses of quetiapine and haloperidol were 67.6 (9.7) and 0.8 (0.3) mg/day, respectively. Over the trial period, means (standard deviation) of the DRS-R-98 severity scores were not significantly different between the quetiapine and haloperidol groups (-22.9 [6.9] versus -21.7 [6.7]; P = 0.59). The DRS-R-98 noncognitive and cognitive subscale scores were not significantly different. At end point, the response and remission rates, the total sleep time, and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson-Angus scores were also not significantly different between groups. Hypersomnia was common in the quetiapine-treated patients (33.3%), but not significantly higher than that in the haloperidol-treated group (21.4%). LIMITATIONS: Patients were excluded if they were not able to take oral medications, and the sample size was small.

conclusionLow-dose quetiapine and haloperidol may be equally effective and safe for controlling delirium symptoms. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00954603.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntipsychotic AgentsDeliriumDibenzothiazepinesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHaloperidolHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuetiapine FumarateSleepAntipsychotic AgentsDibenzothiazepinesHaloperidolQuetiapine Fumaratedeliriumextrapyramidal symptomshaloperidolquetiapine

Identifiers

PMID23926422
PMCPMC3728270
OpenAlexW2091682403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.