Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23926058›Full record

Trial reportPharmacotherapy2014

Pharmacokinetics of tedizolid following oral administration: single and multiple dose, effect of food, and comparison of two solid forms of the prodrug.

Shawn D Flanagan, Paul A Bien, Kelly A Muñoz, Sonia L Minassian, Philippe G Prokocimer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pharmacotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03378427 (Prospective Cohort Study on Patients With Tedizolid Prolonged Therapy for Orthopedic Device Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03378427 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Cohort Study on Patients With Tedizolid Prolonged Therapy for Orthopedic Device Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorTourcoing HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled35ConditionsProsthetic Joint InfectionArmsTedizolid Phosphate 200 MG [Sivextro]
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Importance and Reality of TDM for Antibiotics Not Covered by Insurance in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shawn D FlanaganTrius Therapeutics, San Diego, California.
Paul A Bien
Kelly A Muñoz
Sonia L Minassian
Philippe G Prokocimer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of tedizolid were examined after oral administration of tedizolid phosphate disodium (TPD), including the effect of food on PK. The relative bioavailability of TPD to the free acid tedizolid phosphate was determined to bridge the results of these and other studies to the solid form of the prodrug selected for further development.

designRandomized placebo-controlled, double-blind single- and multiple-ascending dose studies and randomized open-label, crossover food effect and relative bioavailability studies.

settingClinical Research Units.

participantsHealthy subjects.

interventionStudy TR701-101 enrolled 40 subjects in single-ascending dose (200-1200 mg TPD or placebo) and 40 subjects in 21-day multiple-ascending dose (200, 300, or 400 mg TPD once/day; 600 mg linezolid twice/day; or placebo) arms. Study TR701-103 was a food-effect study in 12 subjects administered 600 mg TPD. Study TR701-108 was a relative bioavailability study in 12 subjects administered 150-mg tedizolid equivalents as TPD or tedizolid phosphate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPlasma concentrations of the prodrug tedizolid phosphate, its active moiety tedizolid, and/or linezolid were collected. After administration of 200 to 600 mg TPD, tedizolid values increased approximately dose proportionally in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ). Tedizolid half-life values were approximately 2-fold greater compared with linezolid. TPD administration with food delayed tedizolid absorption and reduced Cmax relative to the fasted state but did not alter AUC. Minimal accumulation was predicted and observed for tedizolid, whereas observed accumulation of linezolid exceeded predictions based on single-dose PK. Comparable PK of tedizolid was observed following oral administration of either TPD or tedizolid phosphate. In the multiple-ascending dose study, 3 of 24 tedizolid subjects were withdrawn under prespecified stopping rules (one each of elevated alanine aminotransferase, low reticulocyte count, or low white blood cell count), as was 1 of 8 linezolid subjects (low reticulocyte count).

conclusionsOverall, tedizolid has a favorable PK profile, a half-life that supports once daily administration, and no nonlinearities at steady state. Tedizolid phosphate can be administered without regard to food.

Indexed as

Food-Drug InteractionsAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultChemistry, PharmaceuticalCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganophosphatesOxazolesProdrugsYoung AdultOrganophosphatesOxazolesProdrugstedizolid phosphatefood effectpharmacokineticsrelative bioavailabilitytedizolid phosphate disodiumtedizolid phosphate free acidTR-700TR-701TR-701 FA

Identifiers

PMID23926058
PMCPMC4238735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.