Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23925462›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2013

[Accidental hypothermia].

H Brugger, G Putzer, P Paal

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanical circulatory support in ventricular arrhythmias.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H BruggerEURAC Institut für Alpine Notfallmedizin, Bozen, Italien.
G Putzer
P Paal
Innsbruck Medical University · ATEurac Research · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncertainty exists on how to treat patients suffering from accidental hypothermia and on the optimal transport decisions. The aim of this review is to provide an updated evidence-based reference for the pre-hospital and in-hospital management of patients with accidental hypothermia and for the transport decisions required to facilitate treatment. Advances in the efficiency and availability of rewarming techniques have improved the prognosis for patients presenting with hypothermia. For hypothermic patients with a core body temperature ≥ 28 °C without cardiac instability there is increasing evidence to support the use of active external and minimally invasive rewarming techniques (e.g. chemical, electrical or forced air heating packs, blankets and warm parenteral fluids). Hypothermic patients with cardiac instability (i.e. systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, ventricular arrhythmia and core body temperature < 28 °C) should be rewarmed with active external and minimally invasive rewarming techniques in a hospital which also has circulation substituting venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) facilities. In cardiac arrest patients VA-ECMO may be a better treatment option than CBP and survival rates of 100 % can be achieved compared to ~ 10 % with traditional methods (e.g. body cavity lavage). Early transport to a hospital appropriately equipped for rewarming has the potential to decrease complication rates and improve survival.

Indexed as

Body Temperature RegulationCardiopulmonary BypassCardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesEvidence-Based MedicineExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart DiseasesHumansHypothermiaPrognosisRewarmingSurvivalTransportation of Patients

Identifiers

PMID23925462
OpenAlexW3190357420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.