ArticlePediatric cardiology2014
How not to tell parents about their child's new diagnosis of congenital heart disease: an Internet survey of 841 parents.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Communicating neurological prognosis in the prenatal period: a narrative review and practice guidelines.Pediatric research · 2025Guideline
- Ethical considerations and multidisciplinary care for pediatric patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a narrative review with a systematic search.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Digital vs face-to-face information provision in patient counselling for prenatal screening: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial.Prenatal diagnosis · 2019Trial
- Embedding Compassion and Communication Frameworks in Pediatric Cardiology.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Parent Perspectives on Optimal Communication About a New Prenatal Diagnosis of Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Concept Mapping Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Prenatal counseling for heart disease: Perception of understanding and communication gaps.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Parental Psychological Response to Prenatal Congenital Heart Defect Diagnosis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An Observational Study of Dialogue about Uncertainty in Clinician-Family Counseling Conversations Following Prenatal Diagnosis of Complex Congenital Heart Disease.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Evaluating How Physician Attitudes May Affect Practice in Fetal Cardiac Counseling.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Ethical Considerations in Fetal Cardiology.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Family Counseling after the Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease in the Fetus: Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- "I Just Want You to Hear That Term": Characterizing Language Used in Fetal Cardiology Consultations.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Article
- Mapping parents' journey following prenatal diagnosis of CHD: a qualitative study.Cardiology in the young · 2023Article
- Palliative Care Across the Life Span for Children With Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023Review
- Parent-Provider Communication in Hospitalized Children with Advanced Heart Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2022Article
- State of the science and future research directions in palliative and end-of-life care in paediatric cardiology: a report from the Harvard Radcliffe Accelerator Workshop.Cardiology in the young · 2022Article
- Parent and Physician Understanding of Prognosis in Hospitalized Children With Advanced Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- The Voice of Parents of Children With a Congenital Anomaly - A EUROlinkCAT Study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- The impact of prenatal counselling on mothers of surviving children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: A qualitative interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Uncertainty of Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease: A Qualitative Study.JAMA network open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An online survey for parents of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) was developed to study the perceptions and experiences of parents when receiving the diagnosis. The survey was distributed to online support groups. A total of 841 responses from parents of children with CHD in the United States were received over a 4-week period in 2010. The authors hypothesized that the counseling and demeanor of the pediatric cardiologist (PC) may be important factors in determining whether parents of children with CHD seek second opinions, and that the terminology used in counseling may be variably interpreted. Of the 841 respondents, 349 (41 %) received the diagnosis prenatally. A minority of the respondents received: support group information (14 %), Internet resources (21 %), success rates at other hospitals (16 %), or maximum ages of survivors (29 %). Among 26 % of the parents who reported seeking a second opinion from another PC, the majority (71 %) chose the second PC for long-term follow-up care. Those receiving a prenatal diagnosis were more likely to seek a second opinion than those receiving the diagnosis postnatally (32 vs 22 %; p < 0.01). Parents' perception of the PC's compassion and empathy was inversely related to the likelihood of seeking a second opinion. Parents were more likely to seek a second opinion when they were not optimistic about their child's life expectancy, felt pressured by the PC to terminate the pregnancy, were told that their child's death was "somewhat" or "very" likely, or were told the child's CHD was "rare" (all p < 0.01). Two thirds (66 %) of the respondents were told that their child's condition was "rare." The majority of these (77 %) reported that the term was used by the PC. "Rare" was interpreted as "occurring in less than a million births" by 25 %, and as "few or no other people alive with this defect" by 27 %. Parental interpretation of "rare" was unrelated to their levels of education. As reported by the respondents, 13 % felt pressured to terminate the pregnancy by the PC. Those with hypoplastic left heart syndrome were more likely to report feeling pressure to terminate the pregnancy by the PC (21 vs 9 %; p < 0.001) or the perinatologist (23 vs 14 %; p = 0.026). The approach to counseling and the demeanor of the PC have important implications for parents' perceptions of their child's chance of survival. The information given at diagnosis, the manner in which it is presented, and the parents' understanding and interpretation of that information are critical factors in shaping parents' perceptions and management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23925415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.