Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23925396›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2013

Sildenafil citrate in the treatment of pain in primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized controlled trial.

R Dmitrovic, A R Kunselman, R S Legro

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00123162 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Sildenafil Citrate in the Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea

TypeinterventionalSponsorMilton S. Hershey Medical CenterRan2007 to 2011Enrolled25ConditionsDysmenorrheaArmsSildenafil Citrate, Placebo
NCT03121170 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea:a Randomized Controlled-placebo Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuirui XingRan2017 to 2019Enrolled44ConditionsDysmenorrhea Primary, Pain, MenstrualArmsextracorporeal shock wave therapy, hot compress paste
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R DmitrovicBetaPlus Center for Reproductive Medicine, Avenija Veceslava Holjevca 23, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia and.
A R Kunselman
R S Legro
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USFoundation for Reproductive Medicine · US

Funding

INSULIN RESISTANCE IN PCOS--SEQUELAE AND TREATMENTK24HD001476 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI LEGRO, RICHARD S. · 2001 to 2005
$675k
The treatment of dysmenorrhea: Effects of sildenafil and oral contraceptivesR03TW007438 · FIC · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI LEGRO, RICHARD S. · 2006 to 2008
$98k
FIC NIH HHS R03 TW007438NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD001476NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD01476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionIs a vaginal preparation of sildenafil citrate capable of alleviating acute menstrual pain in patients with primary dysmenorrhea (PD)? SUMMARY ANSWER: A vaginal preparation of sildenafil citrate is capable of alleviating acute menstrual pain in patients with PD with no observed adverse effects. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Oral preparations of nitric oxide (NO) donor drugs augment relaxant effects of NO on myometrial cells, reverse the vasoconstriction caused by prostaglandins and successfully alleviate pain, but the incidence of side effects is too high for routine clinical use. Sildenafil citrate inhibits type 5-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE5), thus preventing the degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in the muscle and augmenting the vasodilatory effects of NO. Therefore, by inhibiting PDE5, the tissue remains relaxed and more blood can circulate through. It has been used previously in a vaginal form with no observed side effects, and it enhances endometrial blood flow. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing vaginal preparation of sildenafil citrate (100 mg single dose) to a placebo in 62 PD patients at the time of painful menstruation was conducted. The primary outcome was total pain relief over 4 consecutive hours (TOPAR4) comparing sildenafil citrate to placebo, where higher TOPAR4 scores represent better pain relief. Secondary outcomes were pain relief as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) and uterine artery pulsatility index (PI). Subjects were recruited from December 2007 to January 2011. The trial was stopped due to closeout of the funding for the study. PARTICIPANTS, SETTINGS,

methodsParticipants were women in good health, were aged 18-35 years and suffered from moderate to severe PD. They were randomized to either vaginal placebo or 100 mg vaginal sildenafil citrate in a 1:1 ratio using random permuted blocks having a block size of 4. At baseline and 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post-treatment, patients were asked to provide assessment of their degree of pain using two scales: (i) pain on the 5-level ordinal scale used for TOPAR4 calculation and (ii) pain level on the VAS. The study ended 4 h after treatment initiation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Twenty-five subjects completed the study. Using the TOPAR4 score, the sildenafil citrate group had significantly better pain relief compared with the placebo group [mean (SD): 11.9 (3.2) versus 6.4 (2.1), respectively; difference in means = 5.3; 95% CI: (2.9,7.6); P < 0.001)]. On the VAS, sildenafil citrate provided better pain relief than placebo at each time point. At the 2-h time point, the PI was significantly lower in the sildenafil citrate group compared with the placebo group [mean (SD): 1.6 (0.6) versus 2.3 (0.5), respectively; difference in means = -0.7; 95% CI: (-1.2, -0.1); P = 0.01)]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Since we did not meet our sample size due to the loss of funding and could not confirm our primary hypothesis, larger studies of longer duration, likely multi-center, are needed to confirm the findings from this study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsA number of medications have been investigated to improve the treatment options for PD, but most have proven unsuccessful or to have an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio. Since PD is a condition that most women suffer from and seek treatment for at some point in their lives, our study offers hope that vaginal sildenafil citrate is a safe and effective option for patients who do not desire or are unresponsive to treatments now available on the market. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Funding for this study was provided by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants RO3 TW007438 and K24 HD01476. The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00123162 (Clinical trials.gov).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansPainPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPiperazinesPurinesSildenafil CitrateSulfonesPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPiperazinesPurinesSildenafil CitrateSulfonesprimary dysmenorrheasildenafil citrate

Identifiers

PMID23925396
PMCPMC3795469
OpenAlexW2106244441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.