ArticleNature2013
A directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors.
Article in Nature, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 179 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
179 citing papers in PubMed, 402 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drosophila dendrites are resilient to adult-onset deficits in mitochondrial dynamics.The Journal of cell biology · 2026Article
- Distribution and voltage dependence of ion channels shape single-neuron computations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Insect phototransduction: illuminating pathways to precision Pest management.Pest management science · 2026Review
- Central complex representations of self-movement are sufficient to compute wind direction in flight.Science advances · 2026Article
- Population morphology implies a common developmental blueprint for Drosophila motion detectors.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Bio-Inspired Motion-Contour-Guided Visual System for Contrast-Independent Looming Perception.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Homotypic dendritic interactions constrain growth and receptor distribution in Drosophila T4 neurons without affecting orientation or function.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Bio-Inspired Feedback Visual Network for Robust Small-Target Motion Detection in Complex Environments.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Afterimages drive a shared visual motion-reversal illusion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Population Morphology Implies a Common Developmental Blueprint forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Visual input drives diverse ER calcium signals in neuronsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The Drosophila escape motor circuit shows differential vulnerability to aging linked to functional decay.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Visual circuitry for distance estimation in Drosophila.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Article
- Mushroom bodies tiny regulates Sidekick localization to tricellular adherens junctions.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Serotonin selectively modulates visual responses of object motion detectors inJournal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Serotonin selectively modulates visual responses of object motion detectors inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- On analogies in vertebrate and insect visual systems.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extraction of directional motion information from changing retinal images is one of the earliest and most important processing steps in any visual system. In the fly optic lobe, two parallel processing streams have been anatomically described, leading from two first-order interneurons, L1 and L2, via T4 and T5 cells onto large, wide-field motion-sensitive interneurons of the lobula plate. Therefore, T4 and T5 cells are thought to have a pivotal role in motion processing; however, owing to their small size, it is difficult to obtain electrical recordings of T4 and T5 cells, leaving their visual response properties largely unknown. We circumvent this problem by means of optical recording from these cells in Drosophila, using the genetically encoded calcium indicator GCaMP5 (ref. 2). Here we find that specific subpopulations of T4 and T5 cells are directionally tuned to one of the four cardinal directions; that is, front-to-back, back-to-front, upwards and downwards. Depending on their preferred direction, T4 and T5 cells terminate in specific sublayers of the lobula plate. T4 and T5 functionally segregate with respect to contrast polarity: whereas T4 cells selectively respond to moving brightness increments (ON edges), T5 cells only respond to moving brightness decrements (OFF edges). When the output from T4 or T5 cells is blocked, the responses of postsynaptic lobula plate neurons to moving ON (T4 block) or OFF edges (T5 block) are selectively compromised. The same effects are seen in turning responses of tethered walking flies. Thus, starting with L1 and L2, the visual input is split into separate ON and OFF pathways, and motion along all four cardinal directions is computed separately within each pathway. The output of these eight different motion detectors is then sorted such that ON (T4) and OFF (T5) motion detectors with the same directional tuning converge in the same layer of the lobula plate, jointly providing the input to downstream circuits and motion-driven behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.