Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23925246›Full record

ArticleNature2013

A directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors.

Matthew S Maisak, Juergen Haag, Georg Ammer, Etienne Serbe, Matthias Meier, Aljoscha Leonhardt, Tabea Schilling, Armin Bahl, Gerald M Rubin, Aljoscha Nern and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 179 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 402 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Distribution and voltage dependence of ion channels shape single-neuron computations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Afterimages drive a shared visual motion-reversal illusion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Population Morphology Implies a Common Developmental Blueprint forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Visual input drives diverse ER calcium signals in neuronsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. On analogies in vertebrate and insect visual systems.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthew S MaisakMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Juergen Haag
Georg Ammer
Etienne Serbe
Matthias Meier
Aljoscha Leonhardt
Tabea Schilling
Armin Bahl
Gerald M Rubin
Aljoscha Nern
Barry J Dickson
Dierk F Reiff
Elisabeth Hopp
Alexander Borst
Max Planck Society · DEMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DEJanelia Research Campus · USResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraction of directional motion information from changing retinal images is one of the earliest and most important processing steps in any visual system. In the fly optic lobe, two parallel processing streams have been anatomically described, leading from two first-order interneurons, L1 and L2, via T4 and T5 cells onto large, wide-field motion-sensitive interneurons of the lobula plate. Therefore, T4 and T5 cells are thought to have a pivotal role in motion processing; however, owing to their small size, it is difficult to obtain electrical recordings of T4 and T5 cells, leaving their visual response properties largely unknown. We circumvent this problem by means of optical recording from these cells in Drosophila, using the genetically encoded calcium indicator GCaMP5 (ref. 2). Here we find that specific subpopulations of T4 and T5 cells are directionally tuned to one of the four cardinal directions; that is, front-to-back, back-to-front, upwards and downwards. Depending on their preferred direction, T4 and T5 cells terminate in specific sublayers of the lobula plate. T4 and T5 functionally segregate with respect to contrast polarity: whereas T4 cells selectively respond to moving brightness increments (ON edges), T5 cells only respond to moving brightness decrements (OFF edges). When the output from T4 or T5 cells is blocked, the responses of postsynaptic lobula plate neurons to moving ON (T4 block) or OFF edges (T5 block) are selectively compromised. The same effects are seen in turning responses of tethered walking flies. Thus, starting with L1 and L2, the visual input is split into separate ON and OFF pathways, and motion along all four cardinal directions is computed separately within each pathway. The output of these eight different motion detectors is then sorted such that ON (T4) and OFF (T5) motion detectors with the same directional tuning converge in the same layer of the lobula plate, jointly providing the input to downstream circuits and motion-driven behaviours.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophilaInterneuronsLocomotionMotion PerceptionNeuronsSignal TransductionVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID23925246
OpenAlexW2033522594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.