ArticlePloS one2013
Genome-wide survey and comparative analysis of LTR retrotransposons and their captured genes in rice and sorghum.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- The genetic heist: how transposable elements capture and repurpose genes in plants.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Host Factors Promoting the LTR Retrotransposon Life Cycle in Plant Cells: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Retand LTR-retrotransposons in plants: a long way from pol to 3'LTR.Mobile DNA · 2025Article
- Contrasting distributions and expression characteristics of transcribing repeats in Setaria viridis.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Evolving Together: Cassandra Retrotransposons Gradually Mirror Promoter Mutations of the 5S rRNA Genes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Inpactor2: a software based on deep learning to identify and classify LTR-retrotransposons in plant genomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Genome-wide characterization of twoAoB PLANTS · 2022Article
- Full-length LTR retroelements in Capsicum annuum revealed a few species-specific family bursts with insertional preferences.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Coconut genome assembly enables evolutionary analysis of palms and highlights signaling pathways involved in salt tolerance.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Genome-wide identification of the MIOX gene family and their expression profile in cotton development and response to abiotic stress.PloS one · 2021Article
- TE-greedy-nester: structure-based detection of LTR retrotransposons and their nesting.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Genome Size Evolution Mediated by Gypsy Retrotransposons in Brassicaceae.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Additional ORFs in Plant LTR-Retrotransposons.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Transposable element discovery and characterization of LTR-retrotransposon evolutionary lineages in the tropical fruit species Passiflora edulis.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Retrotransposons in Plant Genomes: Structure, Identification, and Classification through Bioinformatics and Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Giant Transposons in Eukaryotes: Is Bigger Better?Genome biology and evolution · 2019Review
- Draft genome sequence of first monocot-halophytic species Oryza coarctata reveals stress-specific genes.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are the major class I mobile elements in plants. They play crucial roles in gene expansion, diversification and evolution. However, their captured genes are yet to be genome-widely identified and characterized in most of plants although many genomes have been completely sequenced. In this study, we have identified 7,043 and 23,915 full-length LTR retrotransposons in the rice and sorghum genomes, respectively. High percentages of rice full-length LTR retrotransposons were distributed near centromeric region in each of the chromosomes. In contrast, sorghum full-length LTR retrotransposons were not enriched in centromere regions. This dissimilarity could be due to the discrepant retrotransposition during and after divergence from their common ancestor thus might be contributing to species divergence. A total of 672 and 1,343 genes have been captured by these elements in rice and sorghum, respectively. Gene Ontology (GO) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that no over-represented GO term was identified in LTR captured rice genes. For LTR captured sorghum genes, GO terms with functions in DNA/RNA metabolism and chromatin organization were over-represented. Only 36% of LTR captured rice genes were expressed and expression divergence was estimated as 11.9%. Higher percentage of LTR captured rice genes have evolved into pseudogenes under neutral selection. On the contrary, higher percentage of LTR captured sorghum genes were under purifying selection and 72.4% of them were expressed. Thus, higher percentage of LTR captured sorghum genes was functional. Small RNA analysis suggested that some of LTR captured genes in rice and sorghum might have been involved in negative regulation. On the other hand, positive selection has been observed in both rice and sorghum LTR captured genes and some of them were still expressed and functional. The data suggest that some of these LTR captured genes might have evolved into new gene functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.